Mealey's Pollution Liability : Mealey's : Legal News & Analysis

Mealey's Pollution Liability

February 07, 2024
In Gold King Mine Case, Contractor Is Granted Summary Judgment On Negligence Claims

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A government contractor is entitled to summary judgment on claims of negligence and gross negligence brought against it for its involvement in the Gold King Mine release, which damaged waterways and land in several states, because the contractor owed no duty to New Mexico, the Navajo Nation or citizen plaintiffs under theories of misfeasance or nonfeasance, a New Mexico federal judge found in granting the contractor’s motion for partial summary judgment.
February 06, 2024
Coverage Owed For Some Fuel Spill Cleanup Based On Pollution Exclusion Wording

LAS VEGAS — An excess insurer owes coverage for fuel oil that spilled from a tractor because the excess policy’s pollution exclusion did not exclude coverage for cleanup costs stemming from a statutory or regulatory requirement, a Nevada federal judge said in finding that some of an insured’s cleanup costs are covered by the excess policy.
February 06, 2024
Insureds Appeal Pollution Exclusion Ruling In Carbon Monoxide Coverage Suit

BISMARCK, N.D. — Insureds filed a notice of appeal to the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, seeking review of a district judge’s finding that a pollution exclusion in their farmowners insurance policy excludes coverage for an underlying bodily injury suit arising out of carbon monoxide exposure at the insureds’ business.
February 05, 2024
Washington Federal Judge Denies Monsanto’s Summary Judgment Motion In PCB Case

SEATTLE — Monsanto Co. and several other companies are not entitled to summary judgment on claims arising from the alleged contamination of Seattle’s waterways with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) brought by the city because there are significant questions of material fact regarding causation, liability and damages, a Washington federal judge found Feb. 2 in denying the companies’ motion for summary judgment.
February 02, 2024
Mo. Federal Judge: State Law Claims Arising From Nuclear Incident Are Preempted

ST. LOUIS — In light of a recent Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals opinion, a Missouri federal judge found Feb. 1 that state law claims arising from alleged property damage caused by nuclear waste at two landfills must be dismissed because they are preempted by the Price-Anderson Act (PAA).
February 01, 2024
Calif. Federal Judge Grants Partial Summary Judgment In Pipeline Rupture Dispute

LOS ANGELES — Two companies that formerly operated an oil pipeline that ruptured and contaminated residential property in Southern California are entitled to summary judgment on several claims, including breach of written easement contracts brought by the owners of property that the pipeline crosses, a California federal judge found in partly granting the companies’ motion for partial summary judgment.
February 01, 2024
Consent Decree Filed To Resolve CWA Claims For Oil Spill That Damaged Indian Land

OKLAHOMA CITY — The United States and two oil companies filed a proposed consent decree in which the companies agreed to pay $7.4 million to resolve claims under the Clean Water Act (CWA) arising from a discharge of heavy crude oil from the companies’ Osage pipeline that contaminated a creek, as well as lands owned by members of the Sac and Fox Nation.
January 31, 2024
Group: EPA’s Approval Of Colorado’s Air Quality Rules Violated Federal Law

DENVER — The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) has filed its opening brief in the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a direct appeal under the Clean Air Act (CAA) related to Colorado’s state implementation plan (SIP) for keeping air pollutants below the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), arguing that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency violated the law in approving the plan. The SIP has particular application with regard to emissions associated with hydraulic fracturing activity.
January 31, 2024
California Federal Judge: CAA Consent Decree Did Not Contemplate Withdrawal

SAN FRANCISCO — Whether Colorado can legally withdraw elements of a state implementation plan (SIP) in light of a consent decree that requires the Environmental Protection Agency to approve or disapprove the SIP is an issue that cannot be decided in the action resolved by the consent decree because the document did not contemplate the issue within its terms, a California federal judge found in denying two environmental groups’ motion to enforce the decree.
January 31, 2024
EPA And DOJ Enjoined From Imposing Disparate Impact Rules Against La. Agencies

LAKE CHARLES, La. — In granting Louisiana’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), a Louisiana federal judge found that the state showed that it would be irreparably harmed if the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) and Louisiana Department of Health (LDH) were required to perform disparate impact and cumulative impact analysis for environmental grant and permitting decisions.
January 30, 2024
Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage For Chemical Explosion, Insurer Says

HOUSTON — No coverage is owed to an insured for underlying lawsuits stemming from an explosion following the release of toxic chemicals at an oil refinery because the insured failed to provide timely notice of the incident and the policy’s pollution exclusion precludes coverage, an excess liability insurer says in a complaint filed in Texas federal court.
January 30, 2024
In Refinery Flare Dispute, Kansas Federal Judge Signs Consent Decree

KANSAS CITY, Kan. — A Kansas federal judge signed a consent decree that resolves claims brought by the United States and Kansas against the operator of an oil refinery for its alleged exceedance of hydrogen sulfide limits at two of its flares.
January 26, 2024
11th Circuit Grants EPA’s Motion To Dismiss Petitions Challenging CAA Decision

ATLANTA — The majority of an 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel granted the Environmental Protection Agency’s motion to dismiss a small refinery’s two petitions for review of the agency’s decision to deny the refinery exemptions to the Clean Air Act’s (CAA) renewable fuel standard (RFS) program because the refinery filed two identical petitions in the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that are currently pending.
January 24, 2024
In CWA Dispute, California Federal Judge Awards Nearly $4M In Fees And Costs

SANTA ANA , Calif. — Following a final judgment based on a jury verdict in which a recycling company was found to have violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) 12,541 times, a federal judge in California awarded nearly $4 million in fees and costs to the environmental group that brought the suit.
January 24, 2024
Washington Federal Judge Revises Order In Light Of New Clean Water Act Final Rule

SEATTLE — In granting summary judgment in favor of a man who says a homeowners association violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) by failing to maintain a manmade wetlands that captures stormwater runoff before it enters a nearby lake, a Washington federal judge revised a previous order denying the man summary judgment in light of a revised definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) that clarifies that a point source under the CWA can also be a WOTUS.
January 24, 2024
5th Circuit: EPA’s Air Quality Findings Were Not Arbitrary Or Capricious

NEW ORLEANS — The Environmental Protection Agency did not act arbitrarily, capriciously or unlawfully when it designated two Texas counties as areas of nonattainment for the 2010 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide because the EPA thoroughly explained why it relied on modeling data from an environmental group when reaching its decision, a divided Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in denying two consolidated petitions for review filed by Texas and several power companies.
January 24, 2024
4th Circuit Declines To Transfer West Virginia’s Case Against Air Quality Decision

RICHMOND, Va. — The District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals does not have exclusive jurisdiction over an Environmental Protection Agency final rule in which the agency disapproved of West Virginia’s plan for complying with new ozone standards because the rule is not nationally applicable and was not based on a determination of nationwide scope and effect, a majority of a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in denying the agency’s motion to transfer West Virginia’s petition for judicial review of the rule.
January 24, 2024
Delaware Judge: Climate Change Claims Limited To Pollution Within State

WILMINGTON, Del. — In partially granting a motion to dismiss filed by several oil companies that are alleged by Delaware to have lied to the public about the harmful effects of fossil fuel products, a Delaware judge opined that the state’s claims for damages are limited to polluting sources from within Delaware itself.
January 24, 2024
Calif. Panel: State Agency Did Not Violate Water Code By Rejecting Mitigation Work

RIVERSIDE, Calif. — The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, did not violate the California Water Code by finding that an engineering company’s attempts to mitigate hazardous tetrachloroethylene (PCE) vapors at its facility were inadequate because the board did not order the company to perform any specific kind of mitigation work, a California panel found in affirming a trial court’s decision to deny a company’s petition for writ of administrative mandate.
January 22, 2024
Supreme Court Agrees To Divide Arguments In Good Neighbor Plan Dispute

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a Jan. 22 order list, the U.S. Supreme granted two motions to divide oral arguments covering four applications for a stay of a final rule, known as the Good Neighbor Plan, issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act (CAA) that would establish an implementation plan for attaining air quality standards for 23 states whose own plans were disapproved by the agency.
January 22, 2024
Citizen Group Failed To Establish Injury On CWA Claims, Calif. Federal Judge Says

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A citizen environmental group that alleges that two modular home manufacturers violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) by, among other things, discharging polluted stormwater from its facility, failed to establish associational standing because it did not support its allegations of injury with independent factual allegations, a California federal judge found in granting the manufacturers’ motion to dismiss without prejudice.
January 19, 2024
Woman Sues Navy For PFAS Contamination Of Island’s Groundwater Supply

SEATTLE — A woman has sued the US. Department of Defense (DOD) and the U.S. Department of the Navy in Washington federal court seeking damages for allegedly contaminating groundwater with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) through discharges of the chemical at a Naval Air Station on Whidbey Island.
January 17, 2024
High Court Told ‘Chaos’ Will Ensue ‘In A World Without Chevron’ Deference

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court was told Jan. 17 that “chaos” will ensue “in a world without Chevron” deference by government attorneys, who urged it to apply stare decisis and uphold Chevron, which is being challenged in two cases arising out of federal fishing regulations.
January 10, 2024
Reinsurer Tackles Third-Party Beneficiary Theory In Cleanup Costs Coverage Row

PADUCAH, Ky. — Arguing in part that what it calls a newly asserted third-party beneficiary theory fails as a matter of law, a reinsurer filed a reply brief on Jan. 9 urging a Kentucky federal court to grant its summary judgment motion in a dispute over pollution-related cleanup costs.
January 10, 2024
Ill. Federal Judge Partly Grants Motion, Denies Another In Environmental Dispute

CHICAGO — An Illinois federal judge on Jan. 9 partly granted a motion by Aurora, Ill., to dismiss a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act counterclaim raised by a company that allegedly disposed of hazardous waste at its scrap-metal recycling site and also saw its motion to dismiss the city’s Clean Water Act (CWA) claim against it denied by the judge in the same decision.