Mealey's Pollution Liability

  • September 18, 2023

    Dispute Over Mercury And PCB Contamination Remanded To Georgia State Court

    BRUNSWICK, Ga. — Two companies accused of releasing mercury and polychlorinated byphenals (PCBs) into waters and marshland near the property of a Georgia city failed to establish fraudulent joinder, federal officer jurisdiction, federal question jurisdiction or diversity jurisdiction, a Georgia federal judge found in granting the city’s motion to remand the case to state court.

  • September 14, 2023

    Federal Judge: Tennessee And Agency Failed To Diligently Prosecute CWA Violations

    COOKEVILLE, Tenn. — An environmental group’s citizen suit against a Tennessee city that has allegedly violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) by failing to maintain its often-overflowing sewer system is not precluded by the CWA’s diligent prosecution bar because neither Tennessee nor its environmental agency has been diligently prosecuting the consent decree they signed with the city regarding the sewer system, a Tennessee federal judge found in denying the city’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

  • September 14, 2023

    Illinois Panel: Homeowner Must Arbitrate Claims Over Firefighting Foam Pollution

    MOUNT VERNON, Ill. — A farmer who claims that his land has been contaminated by firefighting foam used at a nearby mining complex must arbitrate his claims because they are covered by an arbitration agreement within a waiver and release he signed with the operators of the complex two years before the foam was used, an Illinois panel held in reversing a trial court’s decision to deny the operators’ motion to compel arbitration.

  • September 12, 2023

    United States And Tribe Granted Summary Judgment On Clean Water Act Claims

    SEATTLE — In disposing of three motions for summary judgment, a Washington federal judge granted the United States and the Puyallup Tribe of Indians summary judgment on several alleged Clean Water Act (CWA) violations arising from the rupture of a diversion channel during construction at a power plant that caused pollutants to enter the Puyallup River.

  • September 11, 2023

    In Contamination Dispute, Landfill Operator Is Not Entitled To Summary Judgment

    SAN DIEGO — The operator of a landfill that allegedly contaminated groundwater near a new development is not entitled to summary judgment on claims brought against it by the developer because genuine issues of material fact exist regarding the claims, a California federal judge found in denying the operator’s motion for summary judgment.

  • September 06, 2023

    9th Circuit:  EPA Letter Discussing Clean Air Act Not Final Agency Action

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — A letter from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to Chevron U.S.A. Inc. explaining that the companies’ decommissioning of oil and gas drilling platforms on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) might be subject to the Clean Air Act (CAA) is not reviewable because it is not a final agency action, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel said in holding that it lacked jurisdiction over the company’s petition for review of the letter.

  • September 06, 2023

    Questions Exist About Whether Emissions-Altering Devices Were Used In Cars

    GREENSBORO, N.C. — Whether a manufacturer violated the Clean Air Act (CAA) by making products that were designed to defeat federally required emissions controls in motor vehicles is a question of fact that must be decided at a later stage of the proceedings, a North Carolina federal judge found in denying the manufacturer’s motion to dismiss claims brought against it by the United States.

  • September 06, 2023

    D.C. Federal Judge: It’s Too Late To Revert Clean Water Act Permit Program

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Seven environmental groups are not entitled to summary judgment on one of their claims that the Environmental Protection Agency violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when it approved Florida’s application to oversee a Clean Water Act (CWA) permitting program in December 2020 because the groups effectively sought to transfer the program back to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which would not be feasible given how much time has passed, a Florida federal judge found in denying the groups’ renewed motion for partial summary judgment.

  • August 31, 2023

    California Federal Judge Finds Several Companies Liable For Smelter Pollution

    LOS ANGELES — Following a bench trial, a California federal judge reached a verdict on liability and concluded that several companies are prima facie liable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and California’s Hazardous Substance Account Act (HSAA) for pollution released from a secondary lead smelter that contaminated the nearby air and groundwater.

  • August 28, 2023

    Conflicting Expert Testimony Prevents Summary Judgment In Contamination Dispute

    SAN DIEGO — Genuine issues of material fact exist about Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) claims brought by a property developer against an automobile recycling company and the operator of a landfill over the alleged contamination of groundwater near a new development because the parties presented contradictory expert testimony, a California federal judge found in denying the developer’s motion for summary judgment.

  • August 28, 2023

    U.S. Weighs In On CERCLA Statute Of Limitations Dispute Before Supreme Court

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The United States filed an amicus curiae brief arguing that a judgment of liability without a corresponding imposition of costs or award of damages does not trigger the three-year statute of limitations for contribution costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act.

  • August 28, 2023

    Pollution Liability Insurer Says Bad Faith Suit Must Be Heard In Federal Court

    SEATTLE — An insured’s complaint alleging claims for breach of contract and bad faith arising out of a commercial general liability and pollution liability insurer’s denial of coverage for underlying bodily injury suits stemming from exposure to chemicals distributed by the insured must be removed to Washington federal court because diversity of citizenship exists and the amount in controversy exceeds the federal jurisdictional minimum of $75,000, the insurer says in a notice of removal.

  • August 25, 2023

    Magistrate Judge Grants And Denies Summary Judgment Motions In River Pollution Row

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — In granting one and denying another motion for summary judgment, a California federal magistrate judge found that an environmental group sufficiently established standing and that the operator of an equestrian center discharged pollutants into waters of the United States for the purposes of the Clean Water Act (CWA).

  • August 25, 2023

    10th Circuit Says EPA Misapplied Discretionary Guidelines To Emissions Plan

    DENVER — In disapproving a portion of Wyoming’s state implementation plan (SIP) for reducing emissions at several power plants within its borders, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency incorrectly treated some of its discretionary guidelines as mandatory, a 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in vacating a portion of the agency’s final rule on the SIP.

  • August 25, 2023

    Reinsurer Wins Permission To Seal 2 Agreements In Cleanup Costs Coverage Row

    PADUCAH, Ky. — A Kentucky federal magistrate judge on Aug. 24 granted a motion to seal a third-party administrative services agreement (ASA) and a reinsurance agreement, saying the entities involved have a compelling interest that “outweighs the public’s interest in accessing” the documents and that redaction would be “impractical.”

  • August 24, 2023

    In Permit Dispute, New York Federal Judge Dismisses Clean Water Act Claims

    ROCHESTER, N.Y. — Three environmental groups that challenged a state pollutant discharge elimination system (SPDES) permit issued by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) to the owner and operator of a power plant failed to state a claim because they alleged that the state renewal application submitted by the owner failed to comply with federal regulations which it was not subject to, a New York federal judge found in dismissing their complaint.

  • August 23, 2023

    In Mine Cleanup Dispute, Colorado Federal Judge Approves Interlocutory Appeal

    DENVER — Controlling questions of law exist about whether the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act’s statute of limitations bars contribution claims brought by the owner of a former mine site against a smelting company whose predecessors contributed to the pollution of the site, a Colorado federal judge held in granting the owner’s motion for interlocutory appeal.

  • August 21, 2023

    N.C. Federal Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions In Wastewater Contamination Row

    STATESVILLE, N.C. — Genuine issues of material fact exist about statutory and other defenses to Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act claims brought by an adhesive manufacturer that sued numerous parties for allegedly failing to clean totes of contaminated wastewater produced by the manufacturers’ operations and stored on a separate property, a North Carolina federal judge found in denying the manufacturer and a defendant-property owner’s motions for summary judgment.

  • August 21, 2023

    Shrimping Activities Not Covered By Clean Water Act, 4th Circuit Concludes

    RICHMOND, Va. — Shrimpers that operated in North Carolina’s Pamlico Sound did not violate the Clean Water Act (CWA) through their fishing operations because returning bycatch to the ocean is not forbidden under the law and displacing sediment with trawl nets merely kicks up materials already present in the sound, a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in affirming a trial court’s judgment.

  • August 18, 2023

    Calif. Federal Judge Denies Injunction In Dispute Over New Water Quality Standards

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Two trade associations are not entitled to a preliminary injunction preventing the enforcement of California’s new water quality standards because they failed to show that they will suffer irreparable harm if the standards are enforced or are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims that the adoption of the standards was arbitrary and capricious, a federal judge in California found in denying the associations’ motion for a preliminary injunction.

  • August 18, 2023

    Maryland High Court Affirms Approval Of Animal Feeding Operations Permit

    ANNAPOLIS, Md. — The Maryland Department of the Environment’s decision to approve a general permit regulating animal feeding operations (AFO) was not arbitrary or capricious because the permit is reasonable and consistent with the Clean Water Act (CWA) and applicable state law, a majority of the Maryland Supreme Court held in reversing a trial court’s decision to remand the permit.

  • August 17, 2023

    Nonprofit Says Its Ohio Train Derailment Claims Against EPA Are Valid

    YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio — A nonprofit organization has filed a brief in Ohio federal court contending that it should deny a motion to dismiss its lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency related to the East Palestine train derailment and the subsequent toxic chemical spill on grounds the EPA and local authorities failed to conduct proper testing for chemical spills and misled members of the public as to whether the air and drinking water were safe.

  • August 17, 2023

    10th Circuit Denies Petition For Review Of Utah’s Air Visibility Plan

    DENVER — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to approve Utah’s state implementation plan (SIP) for improving visibility in national parks and wilderness areas was not arbitrary or capricious because the agency rationally explained the methodology it used to test the emissions of power plants that contribute to regional haze, a 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in denying a petition for review of the decision.

  • August 16, 2023

    Magistrate Judge Rules On 2 Discovery Motions In Landfill Contamination Dispute

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — In partly granting one and fully denying a second discovery motion filed by a company sued by the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. for response costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act arising from the cleanup of a former industrial and municipal landfill, an Ohio federal magistrate judge ordered Goodyear to produce evidence of response costs it received through settlement agreements with other potentially responsible parties.

  • August 14, 2023

    Ill. Federal Judge: Judicial Notice Cannot Be Used To Dismiss Contamination Case

    CHICAGO — The owner and operator of a gas station cannot use judicial notice to support its argument that claims arising from the alleged migration of hazardous substances from the gas station to a neighboring property are time-barred because the cited documents do not show that the property owner had notice of the contamination, an Illinois federal judge found in denying the owner’s motion to dismiss and request for judicial notice.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Pollution Liability archive.