Mealey's California Section 17200

  • May 10, 2024

    9th Circuit Says Plaintiffs In Loot Box Gambling Suit Failed To Allege Injury

    SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on May 9 found that two video game players who brought California unfair competition law (UCL) claims against a Finnish developer for illegal gambling based on in-game “loot box” sales lacked standing due to failure to allege a cognizable injury.

  • May 10, 2024

    9th Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Borrowers’ Claims Against Loan Servicer

    PASADENA, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 9 affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of borrowers’ suit against their mortgage loan servicer, finding that a breach of contract claim and a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing are time-barred and that the couple failed to state claims for violations of the California unfair competition law (UCL) and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).

  • May 10, 2024

    Data Scraper Prevails In Spat With X Corp., Judge Finds Copyright Preemption

    SAN FRANCISCO — Dismissal in full, with leave to amend, was granted May 9 in a breach of contract and unfair competition action by X Corp., with a federal judge in California declaring that “the extent to which public data may be freely copied from social media platforms, even under the banner of scraping, should generally be governed by the Copyright Act,” and not by “conflicting, ubiquitous” terms of use.

  • May 09, 2024

    Judge Dismisses Consumer’s ‘Slack-Fill’ UCL Suit Against Supplement Maker

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge granted a motion to dismiss a putative class action lawsuit against a nutritional supplement maker for allegedly selling its products with a deceptively large container containing a relatively small amount of product after finding that the court lacked equitable jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ putative class claims.

  • May 09, 2024

    Ad Customers Accuse Reddit Of ‘Click-Through Fraud’ In Class Complaint

    SAN FRANCISCO — A tech company on May 8 filed a putative class action in California federal court against Reddit Inc., operator of a popular social media platform, accusing it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and breach of contract by allegedly charging fraudulent fees per click on digital advertisements to it and other companies while allowing fraudulent clicks on its platform.

  • May 09, 2024

    Judge Tosses Class Action Alleging Ovulation Kits Are Deceptively Labeled

    NEW YORK — A New York federal judge dismissed without leave to amend a putative class action alleging that at-home ovulation test kits were deceptively labeled in violation of New York and California false advertising laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) after finding that the women who purchased the tests failed to show that a reasonable consumer of the products would be deceived.

  • May 09, 2024

    Magistrate Denies Motion For Indicative Relief In FCA Suit Alleging Overcharging

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal magistrate judge denied a relator’s motion for an indicative ruling that pursuant to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ decision in United States ex rel. Silbersher v. Valeant Pharms. Int’l, Inc., a similar False Claims Act (FCA) suit brought by the same relator, the magistrate judge should grant the relator “relief” from the judgment on appeal to the Ninth Circuit after dismissing his claims that pharmaceutical companies overcharged the federal government and states under Medicare and Medicaid.

  • May 08, 2024

    Judgment Entered Dismissing UCL Suit Against OnlyFans For Automatic Renewals

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge on May 7 entered judgment dismissing a putative class action against two entities that own and operate the adult entertainment website OnlyFans after granting a motion to dismiss claims that the company violated California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by failing to notify subscribers that they would be automatically charged monthly for subscriptions to various OnlyFans models.

  • May 06, 2024

    Consumer, Farming Company Settle UCL Suit Over Agricultural, ESG Claims

    SAN DIEGO — A farming company and a consumer on May 3 filed a notice of settlement in California federal court stating that they have resolved the consumer’s putative class claims arguing that the company violated California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by allegedly deceiving the consumer into purchasing its products based on allegedly misleading claims about its agricultural practices made in an environmental, social and governance (ESG) report.

  • May 03, 2024

    On Remand, Judge Dismisses Putative Class Action Against Google For Banner Ads

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — On remand from the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, a federal judge in California dismissed with prejudice putative class claims brought against Google LLC by two website owners for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws in relation to Google’s former practice on its Android search app of superimposing its logo and a “Related Pages” banner on the plaintiffs’ websites, which featured links to competitors’ websites.

  • May 03, 2024

    2nd Circuit Affirms Expert Exclusion, Summary Judgment In Food Labeling Case

    NEW YORK — A district court properly excluded testimony from experts retained by a class of consumers who alleged that an “All Natural” claim on snack foods and granola bars is deceptive or misleading, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said May 2, and because they failed to show that the company’s label would deceive a reasonable consumer, the court affirmed summary judgment and found that arguments that the court erred in decertifying the class are moot.

  • May 02, 2024

    Judge Dismisses Consumer’s UCL Suit Against Herbal Cough Drop Maker

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California federal judge granted a cough drop maker’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed without prejudice a putative class action filed against it by a consumer who claimed that it deceptively advertises its cough drops as offering herbal and medicinal benefits in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • May 01, 2024

    Judge Awards $300,000 In Attorney Fees 3 Years After Retail Voucher Settlement

    SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge on April 30 granted in part plaintiffs’ motion for attorney fees arising from a 2021 voucher class settlement agreed to by a children’s clothing retailer that was accused of advertising false “original” prices when discounting its merchandise in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other state laws.

  • May 01, 2024

    Consumers, Chocolate Company File Joint Motion To Dismiss Heavy Metals Claims

    SAN DIEGO — A chocolate company and three consumers on April 30 filed a joint motion in a federal court in California to voluntarily dismiss the consumers’ putative class action lawsuit accusing the chocolate company of concealing the presence of heavy metals in its chocolates, shortly after a judge denied the chocolate company’s motion for reconsideration of a previous order denying its motion to dismiss.

  • May 01, 2024

    9th Circuit Panel Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice Of UCL Asbestos-Talc Claims

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Plaintiffs in a class action “littered” a fifth amended complaint with descriptions of advertisements, but many appear unrelated to the asbestos-talc claims underpinning the California unfair competition law (UCL) allegations or lack the necessary evidence of reliance, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said in an unpublished memorandum affirming summary judgment for the defendants.

  • May 01, 2024

    California Chick-fil-A Delivery Price Class Suit Dismissed After Settlement In Ga.

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Chick-fil-A Inc. and a customer who brought a class complaint over the fast food company’s delivery prices filed a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice in a federal court in California after the claims were resolved as part of a settlement approved by a Georgia court in February; the California case had been stayed pending settlement since October 2022.

  • May 01, 2024

    Oklahoma Federal Judge Dismisses Some Claims In Underfilled Drug Vial Cases

    OKLAHOMA CITY — The Oklahoma federal judge overseeing cases involving claims that a company underfilled vials of the breast cancer drug Herceptin found that the plaintiffs have not stated a claim for relief under California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and false advertising law (FAL) and dismissed those claims.

  • April 30, 2024

    Roblox Moves To Dismiss Or Arbitrate ‘Child Labor’ Claims In Class Action Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — The online gaming company Roblox Corp. filed motions in a California federal court to dismiss and compel arbitration of claims brought against it by parents of Roblox players who accuse it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by designing its game to addict kids and allegedly profiting off of a “child labor market” wherein minor users perform online tasks in return for Robux.

  • April 30, 2024

    California UCL Claims At Core Of Briefing In ChatGPT AI Case

    SAN FRANCISCO — Briefing recently wrapped in California federal court on a motion to dismiss claims in consolidated lawsuits in which authors allege that OpenAI Inc. and others violated the California unfair competition law (UCL) by training artificial intelligence on copyrighted material.

  • April 30, 2024

    Insurer, Insured Reach Settlement In Water Damage Coverage Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — An insurer filed a notice of settlement in California federal court after reaching a settlement with its insured in a suit seeking coverage for water damages to the insured’s business.

  • April 29, 2024

    Chipmaker Urges 9th Circuit To Affirm Dismissal Of Consumers’ UCL Claims

    SAN FRANCISCO — A modem chipmaker on April 26 filed an appellee brief in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals urging the court to find that consumers’ putative class claims against it for violating antitrust laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) were properly dismissed.

  • April 29, 2024

    High Court Won’t Decide ‘Average’ Class Damages Issue In Chili’s Data Breach Suit

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A question about the propriety of using an “average” damages amount suggested by the plaintiffs’ damages expert to certify a class will go unheard by the U.S. Supreme Court, which in its April 29 order list denied a petition for certiorari by the owner of the Chili’s restaurant chain, which protested the possibility that customers who suffered no damages at all in a 2018 data breach would still receive these damages awards.

  • April 26, 2024

    Panel Affirms Dismissal Of Fortnite Purchasers’ UCL, Antitrust Claims Against Apple

    SAN JOSE, Calif. —A California appellate panel on April 25 affirmed a trial court’s dismissal of two consumers’ claims against Apple Inc. for removing the game “Fortnite” from its App Store and allegedly monopolizing the app market and artificially increasing prices on apps for users of its devices in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and the state’s antitrust law.

  • April 25, 2024

    Magistrate Judge Dismisses Suit Accusing Company Of Wrongly Terminating License

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal magistrate judge granted a software company’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed claims against it for improperly terminating an agreement to operate payroll software for the plaintiff after more than 20 years but granted the plaintiff leave to amend its claim for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • April 23, 2024

    Intentional Discrimination Claims Survive In HIV/AIDS Medication Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — Individuals required by their insurer to use mail or pharmacy pickup to receive their HIV/AIDS medications rather than their preferred community pharmacy have shown intentional discrimination under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) but not proxy discrimination or violation of the California unfair competition law (UCL), a federal judge in the state said in partly denying a motion to dismiss.