Mealey's California Section 17200
-
April 23, 2024
Judge Allows UCL Suit Against Company For Leaky Period Underwear
LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge denied a period underwear maker’s motion to dismiss a putative class action lawsuit against it for violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by advertising and representing its products as “leakproof” when in fact the products were allegedly never tested with human blood and are in fact not as absorbent as advertised.
-
April 23, 2024
Uber, Lyft Ask High Court To Review Arbitrability Of California Wage Claims
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Uber Technologies Inc. and its subsidiaries and Lyft Inc. filed petitions for a writ of certiorari asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a California appellate court ruling affirming the denial of their attempt to compel arbitration of claims brought on behalf of workers by state officials who accused the companies of misclassifying drivers in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).
-
April 22, 2024
U.S. High Court Denies Domino’s FAA Petition In Truck Drivers’ Expenses Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on April 22 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Domino’s Pizza LLC after the company’s truck drivers (D&S drivers) were found by the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in their class case alleging unreimbursed business expenses and violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).
-
April 17, 2024
Federal Judge Clarifies Claims Deadline For Preliminarily Approved Class Settlement
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California issued an order clarifying the claims deadline for the submission of claims for purposes of a $23,997,500 settlement and notice plan that received preliminary approval in a putative class action alleging claims for unfair business practices, false advertising, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation and breach of the duty of good faith against travel insurers.
-
April 16, 2024
AG Sides With Insured In UCL Time Limit Case Before California High Court
SAN FRANCISCO — California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed an amicus curiae brief with the state’s Supreme Court supporting an insured in her challenge to the dismissal as time-barred of her lawsuit claiming that her insurer failed to properly investigate a claim, writing that the court should have applied the four-year statute of limitations based on her claim for injunctive relief under California’s unfair competition law (UCL).
-
April 16, 2024
Rehab Plan Approved Over Workers’ Comp Insurer’s Objections In California Court
REDWOOD CITY, Calif. — Rejecting numerous objections from California Insurance Co. (CIC), a California state judge approved a rehabilitation plan that she said the state insurance commissioner described as being “designed to . . . complete CIC's exit from the state on terms that protect the Company, policyholders, and the public.”
-
April 15, 2024
Movie Studio, Ana De Armas Fans Settle Dispute Over ‘Deceptive’ Trailer
LOS ANGELES — A Hollywood studio and two fans of actress Ana De Armas on April 12 filed notice in California federal court that they have settled the fan’s claims accusing the studio of deceptively enticing them into paying to view a film by using footage in the trailer featuring De Armas that was cut from the final film.
-
April 15, 2024
On Remand, Judge Allows Suit Against Nestlé For Deceptive Sales Of ‘White Morsels’
SAN JOSE, Calif. — On remand from the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, a California federal judge on April 12 granted Nestlé USA Inc.’s motion to dismiss injunctive relief sought against it by consumers who claim that they were deceived into believing that the company’s “White Morsels” baking chips product was made of white chocolate but denied the motion as to their other claims, including for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).
-
April 15, 2024
Panel Affirms ‘Shark Tank’ Star Not Liable For Fraud By Companies He Promoted
LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel upheld a ruling dismissing claims against one of the stars of “Shark Tank,” including for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), finding as the trial court ruled that he is not liable for alleged fraudulent practices by two companies that used his image and statements in their marketing campaign.
-
April 15, 2024
Pipeline Operators, Property Owners Agree To Settle Oil Spill Claims For $70M
LOS ANGELES — In California federal court, two companies that formerly operated an oil pipeline that ruptured and contaminated residential property in southern California filed a motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement that would see the companies pay $70 million to property owners who were affected by the rupture.
-
April 12, 2024
23andMe Data Breach Suits Centralized In Northern California MDL
SAN FRANCISCO — The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPMDL) on April 11 granted a request by genetic testing company 23andMe to consolidate 39 pending lawsuits against it in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, all of which relate to a data breach in which ancestral records for roughly 6.9 million customers were hacked and allegedly sold online.
-
April 12, 2024
Judge Says NJOY Can’t Email UCL Suit To Chinese Vape Makers
SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge denied as “premature” a motion by e-cigarette maker NJOY LLC, an Altria Group Inc. subsidiary, to permit alternative service to several Chinese e-cigarette manufacturers it accuses of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and federal cigarette regulations by illegally selling “Elf Bar” and other brands of flavored disposable vapes (FDVs).
-
April 11, 2024
Insurer Accused Of Using AI Software To Deny Claims ‘En Masse’ In Class Suit
OAKLAND, Calif. — An insured filed a putative class action in California state court accusing his insurer of violating California’s insurance regulations and its unfair competition law (UCL) by using artificial intelligence (AI) software to deny claims for coverage.
-
April 10, 2024
Viability Of UCL Class Action Involving Asbestos And Talc Rests With 9th Circuit
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard oral arguments over whether allegations of a decades-long advertising campaign about the safety and purity of talcum powder sufficiently specifies the advertising in question and saves a California unfair competition law (UCL) class action alleging that in reality the products contained asbestos and other contaminants.
-
April 10, 2024
Pharma Companies Seek High Court Review Of Ruling Reversing FCA Suit Dismissal
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Pharmaceutical companies accused of violating the False Claims Act (FCA) by artificially inflating drug prices filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking review of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ reversal of a district court’s dismissal of a qui tam suit against them, arguing, in part, that the panel “created a circuit split by holding that a relator can avoid the public disclosure bar by ‘stitching together’ public disclosures.”
-
April 10, 2024
Products’ Nutrition Claims With ‘Childlike Drawings’ Are Puffery, Judge Says
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted in part and denied in part a fruit company’s motion to dismiss a putative class action against it for labeling various fruit products as “Healthy” and providing “Good Nutrition” despite containing significant amounts of sugar, writing that the statements are next to “childlike drawings” and therefore unlikely to deceive a consumer.
-
April 09, 2024
Judge: Deception Claims Over ‘100% Recyclable’ Plastic Bottles May Proceed
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on April 8 denied a motion to dismiss a putative class action brought by three consumers and The Sierra Club accusing The Coca-Cola Co. and two other bottling companies of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by labeling plastic bottles as “100% recyclable,” finding that the plaintiffs sufficiently alleged based on a survey that most consumers would be deceived.
-
April 08, 2024
Driver Appeals Grant Of Summary Judgment On UCL Claim For ‘Unfair’ COVID Premiums
SAN FRANCISCO — A driver on April 5 appealed to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a California federal judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of GEICO after finding that it did not violate California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by unfairly profiting from a premium giveback program initiated during the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
April 04, 2024
Panel Affirms Dismissal Of Suit Demanding $160,000 From Medi-Cal Insurer For Supplies
LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel on April 3 affirmed the dismissal of a medical supplies provider’s lawsuit against an insurer that operates under the state’s Medicaid program, finding that the provider failed to plead the existence of a contract that was breached, fraud or a violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) based on the provider’s alleged nonpayment of more than $160,000 for medical supplies.
-
April 03, 2024
Google, Privacy Plaintiffs Propose Injunctive Relief To Settle Data-Tracking Suit
SAN JOSE, Calif. — Leapfrogging over the typical procedure of seeking preliminary approval of a proposed class action settlement over Google LLC’s purported tracking of users’ internet browsing activity and data, the named plaintiffs filed a motion in California federal court seeking final approval of a “groundbreaking” agreement under which the technology giant pledges to make changes to its data collection and retention practices, among other things.
-
April 03, 2024
Chili’s Customers: Class Damages Methodology Review Not Needed In Data Breach Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court does not need to review a question presented by a restaurant chain owner in a data breach case concerning the damages methodology used by the certified classes’ expert as the underlying decision doesn’t present the question Brinker International Inc. seeks to resolve, restaurant customers argue in their respondent brief.
-
April 02, 2024
Judge Grants Summary Judgment In Favor Of Baby Food Maker In Heavy Metals Suit
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted a baby food maker’s motion for summary judgment on class action claims against it for allegedly concealing the presence of heavy metals in its “organic” baby food products in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and consumer protection laws of several other states.
-
April 02, 2024
HP’s $18M Age Bias Class, Collective Settlement Granted Final Approval
SAN JOSE, Calif. — A federal judge in California granted final approval of an $18 million settlement to be paid by HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co. (together, HP) to end a collective and class complaint accusing the technology company of terminating older workers during workforce reductions and replacing them with younger employees in violation of federal and California law, including California’s unfair competition law (UCL).
-
April 01, 2024
Judge Won’t Reconsider Order Allowing Heavy Metal Claims Against Chocolate Company
SAN DIEGO — The chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California on March 29 denied a chocolate company’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying in part its motion to dismiss a putative class action against it for allegedly concealing the presence of heavy metals in its chocolates, rejecting the company’s argument that the court’s ruling permitting labeling claims was based on a “misunderstanding.”
-
March 29, 2024
Flyer’s Suit Against Delta For Deceptive ‘Greenwashing’ Not Preempted, Judge Rules
LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge on March 28 granted in part and denied in part Delta Air Lines Inc.’s motion to dismiss a flyer’s putative class action accusing the airline of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by misleading consumers with “greenwashing” statements such as describing itself as “carbon-neutral” based on its environmental, social and governance (ESG) investments.