Mealey's Toxic Torts
-
March 12, 2024
New York Federal Judge Says PFAS Cosmetics Case Fails To Allege Injury In Fact
NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York has dismissed a class action brought against a cosmetics company related to the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in mascara, finding that the plaintiffs failed to allege that they each suffered an injury in fact and, therefore, they lack standing.
-
March 12, 2024
Judge Denies New Trial For Man Who Lost Glyphosate Case Against Monsanto
ST. LOUIS — A state court judge in Missouri has denied a motion for new trial sought by a man who lost his glyphosate cancer case against Monsanto Co. when the presiding judge granted Monsanto’s motion for a directed verdict. The one-paragraph order simply stated that the motion for new trial was “without merit.”
-
March 12, 2024
Government: Expert In Water Case Warrants Exclusion, Fails To Explain Methodology
HONOLULU — The U.S. government has filed a reply brief in Hawaii federal court arguing that it should strike one of the plaintiffs’ experts in a groundwater contamination case because it is “impossible to verify” whether he applied what is called “grounded theory” appropriately in light of the fact that he refuses to provide details about the methodology he uses to reach his opinions.
-
March 11, 2024
Water Authority Will Settle Class Claims Over Industrial Waste Charges For $11.5M
DETROIT — A Michigan judge granted final approval of an $11.5 million settlement to be paid by the Great Lakes Water Authority (GLWA) to end a class suit by property owners who are not significant industrial users (SIUs) but have paid industrial waste control (IWC) charges imposed by Detroit and GLWA; the property owners sued alleging the charges were wrongfully imposed taxes rather than proper user fees and violated the Prohibited Taxes by Cities and Villages Act.
-
March 11, 2024
S.C. Appeals Court Says Coverage Is Owed For Only Some Remediation Costs
COLUMBIA, S.C. — An insured is owed coverage only for cleaning structures at its wastewater facilities that were contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) because the contamination of the affected structures constitutes direct physical loss or damage under the policy at issue, the South Carolina Court of Appeals said in partially affirming and partially reversing and remanding a master’s order.
-
March 11, 2024
Jury Finds Monsanto Not Liable For Negligence In Roundup Cancer Lawsuit
BENTONVILLE, Ark. — A state court jury in Arkansas has ruled in favor of Monsanto Co. in a lawsuit in which a couple argued that exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup, caused the wife to develop cancer. The jury found that Monsanto was not negligent and did not sell a defective product that caused the wife’s injury.
-
March 08, 2024
School District: Information About Monsanto’s Knowledge Of PCB Dangers Is Relevant
BURLINGTON, Vt. — The Burlington School District (BSD) has filed a brief in Vermont federal court opposing Monsanto Co.’s motion to quash the BSD’s notice of deposition and opposing Monsanto’s motion for a protective order related to testimony from a time period other than 1935 to 1977, arguing that information related to years since 1977 is relevant because Monsanto disputes allegations regarding the information it may have obtained about polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) after that year and disputes the proposition that PCBs pose a public health threat.
-
March 08, 2024
Magistrate Nixes Company’s Bid To Modify Water Contamination Liability Ruling
PITTSBURGH — A federal magistrate judge in Pennsylvania on March 7 denied a glass manufacturer’s attempt to modify a decision finding it liable for groundwater contamination, ruling that by previously entering into a consent order, the company had already agreed that the issues in the opinion its seeks to alter have been decided as they pertain to the company’s liability.
-
March 08, 2024
Judge Nixes Norfolk Southern’s Case Against Railcar Owners For Remediation Costs
YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio — A federal judge in Ohio has dismissed a third-party lawsuit filed by Norfolk Southern Corp. and Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (collectively, Norfolk Southern) that sought to apportion to railcar companies some amount of liability for the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, that resulted in the release of toxic chemicals, ruling that Norfolk Southern failed to state a claim against those companies.
-
March 05, 2024
5th Circuit: Causation Expert Properly Excluded In Deepwater Horizon Injury Case
NEW ORLEANS — A district court properly excluded a man’s medical expert after finding that he failed to show causation in a lawsuit against BP Exploration & Production Inc. related to his injuries through the exposure to chemicals during the cleanup operation that followed the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held.
-
March 04, 2024
Sanctions Not Warranted Against Insurer In Contamination Suit, Special Master Says
DETROIT — An insurer’s failure to timely produce all documents during discovery in an environmental contamination coverage suit does not warrant an imposition of sanctions, but the insured is entitled to re-depose two of the insurer’s claims analysts regarding information in the documents that were not timely produced, a Michigan federal court special master said.
-
March 04, 2024
Widow’s Glyphosate Cancer Case Ends In A Mistrial As Delaware Jury Reaches Impasse
WILMINGTON, Del. — A Delaware state court judge on March 1 declared a mistrial in a Roundup herbicide cancer lawsuit after the jury was unable to reach a decision on claims brought by the widow of a now-deceased landscaper who contends that Monsanto Co. fraudulently represented that Roundup is safe.
-
March 01, 2024
Plaintiffs Seek Stay Of 7th Circuit Mandate Pending U.S. Supreme Court Appeal
CHICAGO — The plaintiffs who had all but three lead-paint injury cases dismissed by a panel of the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals moved in that circuit on Feb. 29 seeking a stay of the mandate related to the panel’s ruling while the plaintiffs prepare a petition for writ of certiorari at the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
March 01, 2024
Government Says Remediation Claim Fails In Water Pollution Case Against U.S. Navy
HONOLULU — The U.S. government has filed a supplemental brief in Hawaii federal court arguing that the plaintiffs’ allegations in their lawsuit against the U.S. Navy, which “second-guess” decisions made in immediate response to a jet fuel spill that allegedly caused groundwater contamination, are barred.
-
March 01, 2024
Judge Sanctions Law Firm With Default Judgment In Camp Lejeune Phone Call Case
WHEELING, W.Va. — A federal judge in West Virginia on Feb. 29 issued an order entering a default judgment against a law firm that is a defendant in a lawsuit over alleged illegal phone calls soliciting clients for mass tort cases relating to toxic water exposure at Camp Lejeune, ruling that the firm has “refused outright” to participate in the litigation and that the court’s efforts to reach it have gone unanswered.
-
February 29, 2024
Plaintiffs Say PFAS Complaint Against L’Oreal Is Supported By Lab Test Results
NEW YORK — The plaintiffs who argue that L’Oreal USA Inc. is liable for making and selling mascara that contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have filed a brief in New York federal court contending that L’Oreal’s motion to dismiss their claim should be denied because it has concealed the fact that its products contain PFAS, knowing that that information would cause consumers to purchase another product.
-
February 29, 2024
FDA Says PFAS Sales For Use In Food Packaging Have Been Discontinued
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Feb. 28 announced that grease-proofing substances containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are no longer being sold by manufacturers for “food contact use” on product packaging.
-
February 29, 2024
Government: 5 Cases Related To AFFF Use At Air Force Base Should Be Dismissed
CHARLESTON, S.C. — The U.S. government filed a motion in South Carolina federal court to dismiss five cases alleging injuries from exposure to the firefighting agent aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), which contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), on grounds that the plaintiffs cannot identify any “mandatory and specific directive” that the U.S. Air Force (USAF) violated in using AFFF at Cannon Air Force Base (CAFB).
-
February 29, 2024
Man Says BP Is Liable For His Cancer From Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, Remediation
WILMINGTON, Del. — A man with cancer who claims that he was injured by exposure to toxic chemicals from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and the cleanup efforts that ensued has filed a lawsuit for compensatory and punitive damages against BP Exploration & Production Inc. and its affiliates in Delaware federal court contending that they are liable for his illness due to negligence.
-
February 28, 2024
Norfolk Southern, Railcar Owners Say School District’s Train Derailment Case Fails
PITTSBURGH — Norfolk Southern Corp. and Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (collectively, Norfolk Southern) and railcar owners have filed briefs in Pennsylvania federal court in support of their respective motions to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Pennsylvania school districts that sued them for injuries related to the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, that led to the release of toxic chemicals in the air and groundwater. Each defendant contends that the school districts fail to allege facts to support their claims.
-
February 27, 2024
Delaware High Court: Letter About Paraquat Exposure Does Not Constitute Claim
WILMINGTON, Del. — The Delaware Supreme Court on Feb. 26 affirmed a lower court’s finding that an insurer owes a duty to defend its insured against underlying bodily injury suits arising out of exposure to paraquat, a chemical compound manufactured by the insured for use in herbicides, because a letter from a law firm sent to the insured a year before the policies at issue incepted did not constitute a claim for damages.
-
February 27, 2024
Energy Companies Say Uranium Injury Case Is Barred By Statute Of Limitations
COLUMBUS, Ohio — Energy companies on Feb. 26 moved in Ohio federal court to dismiss an injury case against them, arguing that pursuant to the Price Anderson Act (PAA), the plaintiff’s cancer claims are “facially untimely” based on a two-year statute of limitations.
-
February 27, 2024
Monsanto: 11th Circuit Roundup Ruling Needs En Banc Review, Implications ‘Serious’
ATLANTA — Monsanto Co. filed a second petition for rehearing en banc in the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 26, arguing that “the full Court’s attention remains warranted,” following a ruling earlier this month by a panel that vacated and remanded to federal district court a long-running dispute over the labeling of Roundup. Monsanto says the ruling that state law failure-to-warn claims related to the herbicide are not preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) or any action of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency “threatens serious implications for medicines, food labeling, and more.”
-
February 26, 2024
Monsanto Not Entitled To New Trial Following $1.5B Roundup Verdict, Plaintiffs Say
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Three plaintiffs who won $1.5 billion in punitive damages against Monsanto Co. for injuries from exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup, filed response briefs in Missouri state court on Feb. 23 arguing that Monsanto is not entitled to a new trial because “the evidence, and the evidence alone, justified this verdict.” Likewise, the plaintiffs argue that Monsanto’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) fails because, among other things, punitive damages are warranted.
-
February 26, 2024
Couple Say Monsanto Has Known Roundup Is Toxic But Misrepresents It As Safe
SAN DIEGO — A husband and wife sued Monsanto Co. in California federal court contending that it is liable for the husband’s injury from exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup, because the company has “long been aware of glyphosate’s carcinogenic properties.” Furthermore, the couple say that despite having that knowledge, Monsanto maintains that regulatory authorities and independent experts are in agreement that Roundup is not genotoxic and that there is no evidence that Roundup is genotoxic.