Mealey's Pollution Liability

  • January 31, 2024

    Group: EPA’s Approval Of Colorado’s Air Quality Rules Violated Federal Law

    DENVER — The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) has filed its opening brief in the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a direct appeal under the Clean Air Act (CAA) related to Colorado’s state implementation plan (SIP) for keeping air pollutants below the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), arguing that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency violated the law in approving the plan.  The SIP has particular application with regard to emissions associated with hydraulic fracturing activity.

  • January 31, 2024

    California Federal Judge: CAA Consent Decree Did Not Contemplate Withdrawal

    SAN FRANCISCO — Whether Colorado can legally withdraw elements of a state implementation plan (SIP) in light of a consent decree that requires the Environmental Protection Agency to approve or disapprove the SIP is an issue that cannot be decided in the action resolved by the consent decree because the document did not contemplate the issue within its terms, a California federal judge found in denying two environmental groups’ motion to enforce the decree.

  • January 31, 2024

    EPA And DOJ Enjoined From Imposing Disparate Impact Rules Against La. Agencies

    LAKE CHARLES, La. — In granting Louisiana’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), a Louisiana federal judge found that the state showed that it would be irreparably harmed if the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) and Louisiana Department of Health (LDH) were required to perform disparate impact and cumulative impact analysis for environmental grant and permitting decisions.

  • January 30, 2024

    Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage For Chemical Explosion, Insurer Says

    HOUSTON — No coverage is owed to an insured for underlying lawsuits stemming from an explosion following the release of toxic chemicals at an oil refinery because the insured failed to provide timely notice of the incident and the policy’s pollution exclusion precludes coverage, an excess liability insurer says in a complaint filed in Texas federal court.

  • January 30, 2024

    In Refinery Flare Dispute, Kansas Federal Judge Signs Consent Decree

    KANSAS CITY, Kan. — A Kansas federal judge signed a consent decree that resolves claims brought by the United States and Kansas against the operator of an oil refinery for its alleged exceedance of hydrogen sulfide limits at two of its flares.

  • January 26, 2024

    11th Circuit Grants EPA’s Motion To Dismiss Petitions Challenging CAA Decision

    ATLANTA — The majority of an 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel granted the Environmental Protection Agency’s motion to dismiss a small refinery’s two petitions for review of the agency’s decision to deny the refinery exemptions to the Clean Air Act’s (CAA) renewable fuel standard (RFS) program because the refinery filed two identical petitions in the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that are currently pending.

  • January 24, 2024

    In CWA Dispute, California Federal Judge Awards Nearly $4M In Fees And Costs

    SANTA ANA , Calif. — Following a final judgment based on a jury verdict in which a recycling company was found to have violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) 12,541 times, a federal judge in California awarded nearly $4 million in fees and costs to the environmental group that brought the suit.

  • January 24, 2024

    Washington Federal Judge Revises Order In Light Of New Clean Water Act Final Rule

    SEATTLE — In granting summary judgment in favor of a man who says a homeowners association violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) by failing to maintain a manmade wetlands that captures stormwater runoff before it enters a nearby lake, a Washington federal judge revised a previous order denying the man summary judgment in light of a revised definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) that clarifies that a point source under the CWA can also be a WOTUS.

  • January 24, 2024

    5th Circuit: EPA’s Air Quality Findings Were Not Arbitrary Or Capricious

    NEW ORLEANS — The Environmental Protection Agency did not act arbitrarily, capriciously or unlawfully when it designated two Texas counties as areas of nonattainment for the 2010 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide because the EPA thoroughly explained why it relied on modeling data from an environmental group when reaching its decision, a divided Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in denying two consolidated petitions for review filed by Texas and several power companies.

  • January 24, 2024

    4th Circuit Declines To Transfer West Virginia’s Case Against Air Quality Decision

    RICHMOND, Va. — The District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals does not have exclusive jurisdiction over an Environmental Protection Agency final rule in which the agency disapproved of West Virginia’s plan for complying with new ozone standards because the rule is not nationally applicable and was not based on a determination of nationwide scope and effect, a majority of a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in denying the agency’s motion to transfer West Virginia’s petition for judicial review of the rule.

  • January 24, 2024

    Delaware Judge: Climate Change Claims Limited To Pollution Within State

    WILMINGTON, Del. — In partially granting a motion to dismiss filed by several oil companies that are alleged by Delaware to have lied to the public about the harmful effects of fossil fuel products, a Delaware judge opined that the state’s claims for damages are limited to polluting sources from within Delaware itself.

  • January 24, 2024

    Calif. Panel: State Agency Did Not Violate Water Code By Rejecting Mitigation Work

    RIVERSIDE, Calif. — The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, did not violate the California Water Code by finding that an engineering company’s attempts to mitigate hazardous tetrachloroethylene (PCE) vapors at its facility were inadequate because the board did not order the company to perform any specific kind of mitigation work, a California panel found in affirming a trial court’s decision to deny a company’s petition for writ of administrative mandate.

  • January 22, 2024

    Supreme Court Agrees To Divide Arguments In Good Neighbor Plan Dispute

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a Jan. 22 order list, the U.S. Supreme granted two motions to divide oral arguments covering four applications for a stay of a final rule, known as the Good Neighbor Plan, issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act (CAA) that would establish an implementation plan for attaining air quality standards for 23 states whose own plans were disapproved by the agency.

  • January 22, 2024

    Citizen Group Failed To Establish Injury On CWA Claims, Calif. Federal Judge Says

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A citizen environmental group that alleges that two modular home manufacturers violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) by, among other things, discharging polluted stormwater from its facility, failed to establish associational standing because it did not support its allegations of injury with independent factual allegations, a California federal judge found in granting the manufacturers’ motion to dismiss without prejudice.

  • January 19, 2024

    Woman Sues Navy For PFAS Contamination Of Island’s Groundwater Supply

    SEATTLE — A woman has sued the US. Department of Defense (DOD) and the U.S. Department of the Navy in Washington federal court seeking damages for allegedly contaminating groundwater with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) through discharges of the chemical at a Naval Air Station on Whidbey Island.

  • January 17, 2024

    High Court Told ‘Chaos’ Will Ensue ‘In A World Without Chevron’ Deference

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court was told Jan. 17 that “chaos” will ensue “in a world without Chevron” deference by government attorneys, who urged it to apply stare decisis and uphold Chevron, which is being challenged in two cases arising out of federal fishing regulations.

  • January 10, 2024

    Reinsurer Tackles Third-Party Beneficiary Theory In Cleanup Costs Coverage Row

    PADUCAH, Ky. — Arguing in part that what it calls a newly asserted third-party beneficiary theory fails as a matter of law, a reinsurer filed a reply brief on Jan. 9 urging a Kentucky federal court to grant its summary judgment motion in a dispute over pollution-related cleanup costs.

  • January 10, 2024

    Ill. Federal Judge Partly Grants Motion, Denies Another In Environmental Dispute

    CHICAGO — An Illinois federal judge on Jan. 9 partly granted a motion by Aurora, Ill., to dismiss a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act counterclaim raised by a company that allegedly disposed of hazardous waste at its scrap-metal recycling site and also saw its motion to dismiss the city’s Clean Water Act (CWA) claim against it denied by the judge in the same decision.

  • January 10, 2024

    S.C. Federal Judge Says Residents Stated Cognizable Clean Water Act Claims

    CHARLESTON, S.C. — A group of residents gave proper notice of their cognizable claims under the Clean Water Act (CWA) by sufficiently alleging that the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency violated the CWA by approving a plan for the development of a mitigation bank in the North Edisto River watershed near their homes, a South Carolina federal judge found in denying the two agencies’ motion to dismiss.

  • January 09, 2024

    Ala. Federal Judge: Group Lacks Standing To Challenge Coal Residuals Closure Plan

    MOBILE, Ala. — An environmental group does not have standing to challenge a power company’s coal combustion residuals (CCR) closure plan under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) because the group’s claims are not “fairly traceable” to the plan or redressable, an Alabama federal judge held in granting the company’s motion to dismiss.

  • January 08, 2024

    10th Circuit: Trial Court Failed To Analyze All Evidence In CWA Judgment

    DENVER — A trial court erred in holding that the operator of a gold mine violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) by discharging pollutants from a processing plant that eventually migrated to a nearby river because there was relevant evidence regarding the discharges that was not thoroughly analyzed, a 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in reversing and remanding the trial court’s judgment.

  • January 05, 2024

    Federal Magistrate Judge Denies Motion To Approve Settlement In CERCLA Case

    MILWAUKEE — In denying a joint motion to approve a pro rata settlement filed by three parties seeking to resolve Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act claims arising from contamination at a former manufacturing plant, a Wisconsin federal magistrate judge found that the record was not developed enough to determine whether one of the former operators of the plant would be prejudiced by the terms settlement.

  • January 05, 2024

    Environmental Center Appeals Judgment Dismissing CWA Claims To 9th Circuit

    SAN FRANCISCO — An environmental law center has appealed an order from the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana in which a federal judge found that the center’s Clean Water Act (CWA) claims arising from alleged discharges of treated wastewater from a mountain resort are barred by a consent decree in a previous case covering the same allegations.

  • January 05, 2024

    California Federal Judge: Recycling Company Violated Clean Water Act 12,541 Times

    SANTA ANA , Calif. — In a final judgment based on a jury verdict, a California federal judge found that a recycling company that discharged stormwater into the Temescal Creek in violation of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is responsible for violating the Clean Water Act 12,541 times.

  • December 21, 2023

    Supreme Court Will Hear Oral Arguments Covering Good Neighbor Plan Stay

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 20 deferred, pending oral argument, consideration of four applications for a stay of a final rule, known as the Good Neighbor Plan, issued by the EPA under the Clean Air Act (CAA) that would establish an implementation plan for attaining air quality standards for 23 states whose own plans were disapproved by the agency.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Pollution Liability archive.