Mealey's Intellectual Property

  • August 22, 2024

    Enactment Of AIA Did Not Change The On-Sale Bar, Federal Circuit Holds

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congress did not intend to change the long-established interpretation of the on-sale bar by enacting the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) because textual changes brought on with the enactment of the AIA text did not materially affect the provision, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in affirming a decision from the U.S. International Trade Commission concerning artificial sweetener patents.

  • August 21, 2024

    Federal Judge Holds Most Counterclaims Survive In Trademark Infringement Suit

    MIAMI — A Florida federal judge on Aug. 20 allowed to stand most counterclaims brought by a defendant company in against a plaintiff company that accused it of trademark infringement through allegedly unauthorized sales of computers through Amazon; the judge dismissed a false advertising counterclaim, finding that the defendant company failed to show how take-down requests made to Amazon amounted to false advertising statements made to customers.

  • August 21, 2024

    Anthropic Faces 1st AI Copyright Suit From Authors

    SAN FRANCISCO — Three authors filed a class action against Anthropic PBC in a California federal court claiming that the company’s business model consists of “largescale theft” of “hundreds of thousands of copyrighted books” so that it can train its artificial intelligence.

  • August 20, 2024

    7th Circuit: Extortionist Failed To Show Ownership Over Celebrity Photos

    CHICAGO — A panel of the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed an Illinois federal judge’s dismissal of a copyright claim brought by a former actor and convicted extortionist against multiple news outlets, agreeing that the man failed to show that he had copyright ownership of photographs of him appearing with multiple celebrities published by the outlets after his arrest.

  • August 20, 2024

    2nd Circuit: No Exception To Copyright Act Limitations Statute’s Discovery Rule

    NEW YORK — A Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel vacated a New York federal judge’s finding that a photography studio’s copyright claims were time-barred, saying the judge incorrectly held that an exception to the “discovery rule” precludes “sophisticated plaintiffs” from bringing a copyright claim three years after the discovery of the alleged infringement.

  • August 20, 2024

    Federal Circuit Dismisses Hydrogenated Silicon Patent Appeal For Lack Of Standing

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — There is no live case or controversy regarding hydrogenated silicon patent infringement claims because the patent owner dismissed its claims with prejudice, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in dismissing an appeal of a final written inter partes review decision issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

  • August 20, 2024

    Nike’s Shoe Patent Claims Against New Balance Will Continue In Mass. Federal Court

    BOSTON — New Balance failed to show that Nike’s factual allegations contradicted New Balance’s interpretation of three shoe patents it allegedly infringed by manufacturing and selling its own shoes, a Massachusetts federal judge found in denying New Balance’s partial motion to dismiss.

  • August 19, 2024

    11th Circuit Rejects Artist’s Copyright Claims For Banana Piece

    ATLANTA — A panel of the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 16 affirmed a Florida federal judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of an artist who saw online virality after duct taping a banana to a wall at a Miami art fair, agreeing with the judge that another artist failed to show how the work infringed on his own art piece also involving a banana duct taped to a wall from nearly two decades earlier.

  • August 19, 2024

    Sale Of Invention Was Not ‘Public Disclosure,’ Federal Circuit Says In Patent Case

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The private sale of a product that contained the subject matter of a patent application that was filed several days later does not mean the application itself cannot be considered prior art because the sale did not result in the public disclosure of the inventive subject matter, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in affirming the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) finding that a patent for a port apparatus used with electronic devices was obvious in light of the application.

  • August 16, 2024

    Federal Circuit Vacates Preliminary Injunction In E-Cigarette Trademark Dispute

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge in Florida was wrong to issue a preliminary injunction against a Chinese e-cigarette manufacturer and its American wholesalers in a trademark and patent dispute brought by an American e-cigarette maker, a panel of judges in the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held, saying that the judge did not adequately consider the Chinese company’s argument that the American manufacturer did not have a valid claim to the contested mark because it did not seek approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for its product.

  • August 16, 2024

    9th Circuit Reverses Finding Of No Jurisdiction In Sumo Wrestling Copyright Fight

    SAN FRANCISCO — A partially split panel of judges in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals partially reversed a California federal judge’s decision to dismiss a copyright infringement dispute between two broadcasting companies over a sumo wrestling competition because the alleged infringement occurred entirely in Japan; the panel majority held that the plaintiff company could conceivably show the circumvention of copyright law occurred domestically.

  • August 16, 2024

    Fla. Federal Judge: Patent Commission Case Belongs In Courts Of England And Wales

    MIAMI — A dispute over whether a consulting firm is entitled to an anticipated judgment allegedly arising from the firm’s efforts to monetize two service control technology permits must be heard in the courts of England and Wales because the brokerage agreement between the firm and the patent owners contains a forum-selection clause selecting that forum, a Florida federal judge found in granting the owner’s motion to dismiss.

  • August 15, 2024

    News Outlets Say Stable Diffusion AI Ruling Supports Copyright Case

    NEW YORK — A ruling allowing induced copyright infringement claims and finding Stable Diffusion artificial intelligence itself an infringing work applies to contributory infringement claims alleging that ChatGPT memorized works and will output “near-verbatim” replicas, news outlets argue in an Aug. 14 notice of supplemental authority.

  • August 15, 2024

    Guitar Seller Says 1st Circuit Wrongly Ordered New Trial In Copyright Case

    BOSTON — A guitar seller who was accused of copyright infringement by a guitar manufacturer that said it used a copyrighted photo of guitar headstocks on its website filed a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc after a First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ordered a new trial in a New Hampshire federal court, arguing that the panel widened a circuit split over what standard a court can use to determine the relationship between alleged infringement and subsequent revenue.

  • August 15, 2024

    Judge Says Some AI Copyright Claims Survive In Visual Arts Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — An amended complaint permissibly adds claims and defendants, and while some of those claims are unsuccessful, copyright claims against DeviantArt, Stability AI Ltd. and others survive, thanks in part to new allegations of improper copying of works to train artificial intelligence, a federal judge in California said in partially granting motions to dismiss.

  • August 15, 2024

    4th Circuit: Wireless Carrier Shows It Intended To Begin Reusing Trademark

    RICHMOND, Va. — A panel of the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals vacated a federal judge’s grant of summary judgment in a trademark dispute in favor of defendant wireless communications company T-Mobile US Inc., holding that plaintiff company Simply Wireless Inc. had raised a genuine question of material fact as to whether it had abandoned its use of the contested “SIMPLY PREPAID” mark.

  • August 15, 2024

    Owner Of Charging Bag Patent Fails To Secure Default Judgment In N.Y. Federal Court

    BUFFALO — The owner of a patent that describes a bag or luggage that has a USB charging connector is not entitled to default judgment on the claim of patent infringement it brought against a competitor because the owner failed to attach a copy of its patent to its motion for default judgment, a New York federal judge found in denying the motion without prejudice.

  • August 14, 2024

    Patent Attorney Urges High Court To Decline Review Of 9th Circuit FCA Reversal

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A patent attorney who was a district court’s qui tam plaintiff in a suit accusing pharmaceutical companies of violating the False Claims Act (FCA) by artificially inflating drug prices urges the U.S. Supreme Court to decline review of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling reversing the district court’s dismissal, arguing that the Ninth Circuit correctly “held that the public disclosures did not collectively disclose the fraud.”

  • August 14, 2024

    5th Circuit Issues Updated Opinion In Copyright Row Over Canadian Legal Codes

    NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued a new version of a July opinion in which it reversed a Texas federal judge’s grant of summary judgment against a publisher accused by a Canadian developer of legal codes and standards of illegally republishing complete versions of the code because the code is effectively uncopyrightable “law” in Canada, removing a reference to the developer referring to itself as a government agency.

  • August 14, 2024

    Federal Judge Adopts Recommendation, Says Ignition Mitigation Patents Are Invalid

    MIAMI — In adopting a federal magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, a Florida federal judge agreed that three patents that form a method and system of fuel tank mitigation were invalid under the on-sale bar because the inventor made three commercial offers for sale of the patented method before applying for patent protection.

  • August 13, 2024

    After Dismissing UCL Claim, Judge Relieves Plaintiffs Of ChatGPT Discovery

    SAN FRANCISCO — Attorney-created prompts and testing of ChatGPT constitute protected opinion work product, and copyright infringement plaintiffs did not waive work product protections by including some results in their complaint, and the protections are not overcome simply because production would shed light on the case, a federal judge in California said in granting relief from a magistrate judge’s ruling.

  • August 13, 2024

    5th Circuit Revives Chef’s Trademark Claims Against Purchasers Of His Restaurant

    NEW ORLEANS — A panel of the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 12 partly revived a trademark infringement suit brought by a Texas chef against a group of entities he claimed infringed upon his trademarks after the end of a licensing agreement, finding that a federal judge in Texas erred by determining that the chef had failed to state a claim.

  • August 13, 2024

    PTO Director’s Former Role In Case Didn’t Affect Due Process Rights, Panel Says

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The owner of three computer data patents was not deprived of its due process rights when the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted inter partes review after opposing counsel in a dispute over the patents was nominated and appointed as director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) because the director properly recused herself from the case and the administrative law judges of the PTAB had no pecuniary interest in agreeing with the arguments she formerly presented before them, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in affirming three final written decisions from the PTAB.

  • August 13, 2024

    In COVID-19 Vaccine Case, Federal Judge Says Patent Preambles Must Be Considered

    WILMINGTON, Del. — The term “vaccine” within the preamble of a patent that was allegedly infringed upon by the manufacturing of various COVID-19 vaccines is a limitation of the patent’s claims because the term describes the intended use of the patent itself, a Delaware federal judge found in issuing a claim construction order interpreting the patent at issue.

  • August 13, 2024

    Patent Trial And Appeal Board Panel Says Blood Pooling Method Was Not Obvious

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A patent examiner erred in finding that a method of separating blood components by pooling blood samples together from multiple donors was obvious because none of the prior art mentions pooling blood together, a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) panel found Aug. 12 in rejecting the examiner’s findings.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Intellectual Property archive.