( July 26, 2024, 10:51 AM EDT) -- WASHINGTON, D. C. — A federal trial court did not err in denying a motion for a judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) because substantial evidence supported a jury’s finding that beverage can patents were anticipated by a previous patent, a Federal Circuit U. S. Court of Appeals panel found July 25 in affirming the trial court’s judgment. . . .