Mealey's Insurance Bad Faith
-
February 11, 2025
Insureds Failed To Show Additional Coverage Owed For Asbestos Removal, Judge Says
DALLAS — Insureds seeking additional coverage for the removal of asbestos in their home failed to show that additional coverage is afforded under their homeowners policy for removal of asbestos that was not related to the insureds’ claim for water damage in their home, a Texas federal judge said in granting the insurer’s motion for summary judgment on the insureds’ breach of contract and extracontractual claims.
-
February 07, 2025
5th Circuit Affirms Ruling In Insurer’s Favor In Bad Faith Suit Over Wind Damage
NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 6 held that a lower federal court properly granted summary judgment in favor of a homeowners insurer as to the insured’s extracontractual bad faith claims in a wind damage coverage dispute, finding that the insured is barred him from recovering any additional damages from the insurer under Texas Supreme Court precedent.
-
February 07, 2025
Federal Jury Awards Insured $39.9M In Damages In Hailstorm Coverage Dispute
TYLER, Texas — A jury in a Texas federal court unanimously awarded an insured $4,838,747 in damages for its commercial property insurer’s breach of contract and $35 million in exemplary damages for the insurer’s breach of its duty of good faith and fair dealing in a coverage dispute arising from property damage that was caused by an April 12, 2020, wind and hailstorm.
-
February 07, 2025
8th Circuit: Exclusion Bars CGL Coverage For Loss Caused By Defective Design
ST. LOUIS — The Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 6 affirmed a lower federal court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of a commercial general liability insurer in an insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit seeking coverage for losses caused by a defectively designed hopper bin that catastrophically failed at a Mexico facility, agreeing with the lower court that the policy’s professional services exclusion barred coverage.
-
February 06, 2025
6th Circuit Stands By No Coverage Ruling In Home Depot’s Suit Over Data Breach
CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 5 denied Home Depot’s petition seeking a panel rehearing of a majority ruling that affirmed an Ohio federal court’s finding that a commercial general liability insurance policy’s electronic data exclusion bars coverage for Home Depot’s losses stemming from a 2014 data breach.
-
February 06, 2025
Partial Dismissal Of Counterclaims Granted In $3.3M Health Care Fraud Dispute
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — An Alaska federal judge on Feb. 5 granted in part a motion to dismiss counterclaims in a fraud suit filed by an Alaska health insurer against a California treatment facility alleging approximately $3.3 million of fraudulent claims related to the facility purportedly falsifying income of prospective patients when enrolling them in the health insurer’s plan, finding that the bad faith counterclaims should be dismissed as not adequately pleaded and that there is no private right of action pursuant to an Alaska statute.
-
February 05, 2025
Reinsurer Wins Dismissal Of $844M Suit To Enforce Consent Judgments
MIAMI — A reinsurer won dismissal with prejudice of a case that sought to enforce approximately $844 million in consent judgments entered against an airline in connection with a 2016 plane crash, with a Florida judge ruling in part that “Florida law narrowly restricts the circumstances in which an insured can ever directly pursue claims against a reinsurer to facts that are not alleged here.”
-
February 04, 2025
Home Depot Asks 6th Circuit To Rehear No Coverage Ruling In Data Breach Dispute
CINCINNATI — Home Depot filed a petition in the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals seeking a panel rehearing of a majority ruling that affirmed an Ohio federal court’s finding that a commercial general liability insurance policy’s electronic data exclusion bars coverage for Home Depot’s losses stemming from a 2014 data breach.
-
February 04, 2025
Panel: Homeowners Insurer Not Independently Liable For Alleged Dangerous Property
FRANKFORT, Ky. — A Kentucky appeals court panel held that under the terms of a homeowners insurance policy, the insurer is not independently liable for the purportedly dangerous condition of an insured’s property, affirming a lower court’s dismissal of a bad faith lawsuit seeking $300,000 in personal liability coverage for an injury that occurred at the insured property.
-
February 03, 2025
Excess D&O Insurer Seeks Dismissal Of Law Firm’s Suit Seeking Payment For Invoices
MIAMI — An excess directors and officers liability insurer moved to dismiss 11 of 12 claims in a law firm’s lawsuit seeking payment for the legal representation of its insured, alleging the law firm failed to state a cause of action and the claims are “nothing more than repeated attempts” to have the insurer pay two invoices.
-
January 31, 2025
Dismissal Of Policy Fraud Counterclaim Denied In Car Crash Breach Of Contract Suit
LAS VEGAS — A Nevada federal judge on Jan. 30 denied a motion to dismiss an insurer’s counterclaim seeking a declaration that a misrepresentation or fraud endorsement applies to prevent further payment under a commercial insurance policy in a breach of contract suit filed against the insurer by a man injured in an auto accident, finding that the counterclaim alleges misrepresentations that were material to the insurer’s valuations as to the man’s purported loss of earnings.
-
January 31, 2025
Majority Affirms Ruling In Insurers’ Favor In Bad Faith Suit Over Flood Deductible
NEW ORLEANS — A majority of the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that a lower federal court did not err in determining that the extrinsic evidence resolved an ambiguity in favor of the insurers’ interpretation of a policy flood deductible, affirming the lower court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of the insurers in a general contractor’s bad faith lawsuit arising from flood damage at a hotel renovation.
-
January 31, 2025
Oklahoma High Court: Prevailing Insureds Don’t Have To Put Loss On Paper
OKLAHOMA CITY — A unanimous Oklahoma Supreme Court says a trial court erred in ruling that insureds whose home suffered storm damage had to submit a written proof of loss to insurer State Farm to seek attorney fees after winning a $750,000 jury verdict.
-
January 30, 2025
Questions Of Fact Exist As To Whether Home Is Insured’s ‘Residence Premises’
PITTSBURGH — A bad faith claim alleged against a homeowners insurer cannot proceed because the insured failed to show that the insurer did not have a reasonable basis to deny coverage for a fire damage claim; however, the insured’s breach of contract claim can proceed because questions of fact exist as to whether the home that was damaged by the fire was the insured’s “residence premises” as required by the policy, a Pennsylvania federal judge said in partially granting the insurer’s motion for summary judgment.
-
January 30, 2025
Beneficiary Of Life Insurance Policy Failed To Show Benefit Denial Was Unreasonable
SCRANTON, Pa. — A life insurance beneficiary’s breach of contract claim against a life insurer can proceed because the beneficiary sufficiently alleged that accidental death benefits may be available pursuant to a policy rider; however, the beneficiary’s bad faith claim must be dismissed without prejudice because the beneficiary failed to show that the insurer did not have a reasonable basis to deny coverage, a Pennsylvania federal judge said in partially granting the insurer’s motion to dismiss.
-
January 29, 2025
Panel Upholds Dismissal Of Hurricane Damage Suit Against Property Insurer
NEW ORLEANS — An insured’s breach of contract and bad faith claims stemming from a dispute over coverage for property damages sustained during a hurricane to 18 rental properties were properly dismissed because the insured failed to provide sufficient facts or details regarding the damages sustained to the properties and the property insurer’s handling of the insured’s claim, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said.
-
January 29, 2025
Suit Limitation Provision Bars Homeowner’s Breach Of Contract, Bad Faith Claims
WASHINGTON, D.C. — An insured’s breach of contract and bad faith claims against her homeowners insurer fail because the insured failed to file suit within the policy’s one-year suit limitations provision, a District of Columbia federal judge said in granting the insurer’s motion for summary judgment.
-
January 29, 2025
Disability Income Insurer Properly Interpreted Policy Terms, Panel Says
BOSTON — A trial court did not err in granting a disability income insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings on breach of contract and bad faith claims because the policy clearly defines how monthly benefits will be paid to an insured and how monthly benefits will be paid under the disability insurance policy’s lifetime rider, a Massachusetts Appeals Court panel said in affirming the trial court’s ruling.
-
January 28, 2025
Suit Seeking Coverage For Chemical Exposure Injuries Removed To Federal Court
SEATTLE — An insurer acted in bad faith and breached its contract by withdrawing its defense of an insured in an underlying suit alleging that a couple’s exposure to chemicals distributed by the insured caused the couple’s child to be born with spina bifida, the insured says in a complaint removed by the insurer to Washington federal court.
-
January 27, 2025
Judge Dismisses Lloyd’s From Freddie Mac’s D&O Coverage Suit Following Settlement
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge in the District of Columbia granted Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (Freddie Mac) and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London’s motion to dismiss with prejudice the dispute between them after they indicated that they have settled Freddie Mac’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit seeking directors and officers liability coverage for underlying expenses it incurred on behalf of its directors, officers and employees who were subpoenaed by the Securities and Exchange Commission during an investigation and subsequent lawsuit.
-
January 27, 2025
Breach Of Contract, Bad Faith Claims In Asbestos Abatement Dispute Fail
GREENBELT, Md. — A Maryland federal magistrate judge granted a homeowners insurer’s motion for summary judgment on breach of contract and bad faith claims after determining that the insured failed to support her claims that the insurer breached its contract and acted in bad faith in its handling of the insured’s claim for asbestos abatement and a full roof replacement.
-
January 27, 2025
Condo Developer Asks 10th Circuit To Reconsider Ruling Granting New Trial
DENVER — A condominium developer filed a “relatively narrow” petition in the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals seeking a panel rehearing of the court’s grant of an new trial following its reversal of a $2.54 million jury award in favor of the developer after finding that the developer cannot recover under a builders risk insurance policy for repair costs of a cracked concrete slab that it has not paid and has no obligation to pay, arguing that rehearing is both “appropriate and necessary” to correct the court’s errors, preserve the parts of the jury verdict that were fairly found and “avoid the significant costs of a wholesale retrial.”
-
January 24, 2025
Bad Faith Case For Handling Of Claim Settles After 2 Experts Are Admitted
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — A week after a Florida federal court judge ruled that competing experts opining on industry standards for handling a bodily injury claim stemming from a car accident can testify, a woman who sued an insurance company for bad faith for failing to settle the claim notified the court that the parties have reached a settlement.
-
January 24, 2025
6th Circuit Denies Building Owner, Contractor’s Rehearing Petitions In Collapse Suit
CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied petitions for rehearing filed by a building owner and a contractor, refusing to reconsider a panel’s finding that coverage is owed only for a portion of a wall that collapsed in a building that was undergoing renovation.
-
January 22, 2025
Judge Vacates Order Compelling Arbitration Of $7M Hurricane Claim
NEW ORLEANS — A Louisiana federal judge, citing new Louisiana Supreme Court precedent on the arbitrability of insurance claims, granted a motion filed by two New Orleans property owners’ to vacate an order compelling arbitration of their claims for $7 million in damages caused by Hurricane Ida and for bad faith against a group of foreign and domestic insurers, a ruling that was previously upheld by the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.