District Court’s Collapse Ruling Was Not Clearly Erroneous, Insurer Says

(August 19, 2024, 11:13 AM EDT) --  XE "Collapse" CINCINNATI — A district court’s finding that no coverage is owed for a structurally unsound wall that remained standing after a portion of the wall collapsed during a building renovation was not clearly erroneous because the wall remained standing and did not collapse as required for coverage to be afforded under the policy, the insurer says in its Aug. 16 appellee brief filed in the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals....