Mealey's Discovery : Mealey's : Legal News & Analysis

Mealey's Discovery

February 22, 2024
5th Circuit Vacates Discovery Order, Remands For Stay Pending Arbitration Ruling

NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that no discovery is needed to determine whether there is a valid agreement to arbitrate because a Hurricane Laura coverage dispute can be decided as a matter of law, vacating the lower federal court’s discovery order and remanding for the lower court to immediately grant a stay pending its ruling on arbitration.
February 20, 2024
Petition By Wrestlers’ Attorney Challenging Sanctions Denied By U.S. High Court

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 20 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by an attorney and his firm who represent allegedly injured wrestlers in a class tort complaint and a mass action against World Wrestling Entertainment Inc. and Vincent K. McMahon (together, WWE) and asking the justices to consider the appropriateness of attorney fees and costs as sanctions that they have been ordered to pay.
February 16, 2024
Agency: Evidence Production In Ohio Train Derailment Case Poses ‘Undue Burden’

YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio — The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) filed a brief in Ohio federal court arguing that it should deny a third-party defendant’s motion to compel the production of certain evidence related to the NTSB’s investigation of the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, on grounds that the motion imposes an undue burden on the agency.
February 16, 2024
Groups Sue EPA For Withholding Information On PFAS Use In Plastics Manufacturing

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Two environmental groups on Feb. 15 sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking a permanent injunction directing it to disclose under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) all “wrongfully withheld documents” related to the formation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) during the fluorination of plastic containers by chemical company Inhance Technologies LLC.
February 14, 2024
GitHub, Microsoft, Coders To Confer Over Discovery In AI Copyright Licensing Row

OAKLAND, Calif. — In a dispute over licensing and attribution of computer code in open-source artificial intelligence (AI) collaborations, a California federal judge scolded defendants GitHub Inc. and Microsoft Corp. and five John Doe plaintiffs for not complying with the proper procedures for submitting discovery letters, leading him to deny the relief sought by the parties and to once again order them to meet and confer over their remaining discovery disputes.
February 13, 2024
Hospital Says Burden, Third-Party Status Warranted Quashing Asbestos Subpoena

RICHMOND, Va. — Third-party subpoenas fall under a higher standard that an asbestos defendant cannot meet given the evidence’s marginal relationship to the case, a hospital told the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 12, also arguing that the burden that disclosing anonymous study participants would impose supports a trial court’s decision to quash the subpoena.
February 13, 2024
Magistrate Judge Allows Supplemented Expert Reports, Extends J&J MDL Deadlines

TRENTON, N.J. — A magistrate judge in the federal multidistrict litigation for Johnson & Johnson talc-related liabilities declined to strike expert reports, saying the importance of the reports and the ability to mitigate any resulting harm by extending discovery deadlines do not support such a harsh outcome.
February 08, 2024
Monsanto Seeks To Quash Deposition In Vermont School PCB Contamination Case

BURLINGTON, Vt. — Monsanto Co. on Feb. 7 moved in Vermont federal court seeking to quash the Burlington School District’s (BSD) notice of deposition in the polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) lawsuit it has filed related to alleged contamination of school buildings and moved for a protective order to the extent that the BSD seeks testimony from a time period other than 1935 to 1977, when Monsanto made PCBs.
February 07, 2024
4th Circuit Defers Ruling On Sanctions In Asbestos Case Referral Appeal

RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals will defer any ruling on a separate motion for sanctions pending review of the merits of an appeal involving whether a trial court properly imposed sanctions for conduct in an asbestos bankruptcy trust referral fee dispute.
February 07, 2024
Colgate, Asbestos-Talc Plaintiff Face Off About Genetics, Expert Testimony

OAKLAND, Calif. — After a plaintiff moved to exclude argument about why she didn’t undergo genetic testing and what her genetics might mean for her mesothelioma, an asbestos-talc defendant filed its own motion seeking to exclude what it termed unreliable non-witness expert testimony that it says the plaintiff hopes to introduce into the case through the “backdoor.”
February 06, 2024
Panel Upholds Sanction But Reinstates Loofah Patent Infringement Case

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal magistrate judge in Arkansas did not abuse his discretion in sanctioning a patent owner for discovery abuse but committed several errors during claim construction, leading to a jury verdict and final judgment of noninfringement that must be vacated, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals found Feb. 5.
February 06, 2024
North Dakota: Agencies Are Not Complying With Order For Fracking Lease Information

BISMARCK, N.D. — The state of North Dakota has filed a brief in North Dakota federal court in response to a status report filed by the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), in which the state argues that the DOI and other federal defendants have not complied with the court’s prior orders regarding transparency and the production of documents related to the parties’ dispute over an order that enjoined and restrained the federal agencies from imposing what the state calls “the Stop.” That term refers to the federal agencies’ decision to cancel certain hydraulic fracturing lease sales.
February 05, 2024
Rail Company Defends Need For Testimony Of Former Libby, Mont., Clinic Director

GREAT FALLS, Mont. — A railway tells a federal judge in Montana in opposition to a motion to quash the railway’s subpoena that trial preservation testimony is the best way to secure potentially admissible evidence from an asbestos clinic’s former medical director and that his status as a former employee doesn’t matter since he can testify about how a clinic patient described her exposures to asbestos.
February 02, 2024
University Must Provide Past Incident Info To Student Claiming Sexual Assault

HUNTINGTON, W.Va. — Police reports, communications and other information about previously reported incidents of off-campus sexual assaults and harassment are relevant to a university student’s claims of sexual discrimination over the school’s response to her claimed assault, a West Virginia federal magistrate judge found, ordering Marshall University to supplement its discovery responses.
February 02, 2024
Judgment Granted For Insurer In Row Over Misrepresentation Of Harassment Suit

SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge granted summary judgment to an employment practices liability insurer in a declaratory judgment suit against its insured, finding that the insurer is entitled to rescind the policies because it would not have issued the policies had it known of the insured’s false affirmation in the policy application that no harassment suits were made against it in the last five years.
February 01, 2024
Accounting Denied As To Disputed $185 Million Attorney Fees In Insurers’ ACA Row

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A U.S. Court of Federal Claims judge denied in part objecting class members’ motion for an accounting of a vacated $185 million attorney fee award in suits filed by insurers, some of which are insolvent, over risk-corridor payments under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), finding that because the court has not yet considered a renewed fee request, the accounting is unnecessary at this time.
January 31, 2024
Sanctions Sought In Asbestos Appeal Over Sanctions In Referral Case

RICHMOND, Va. — An appeal before the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals over the appropriateness of sanctions in a case involving asbestos bankruptcy trust referral fees spawned its own briefing on sanctions, with the appellee calling the appeal frivolous and the appellant saying meritorious issues of first impression exist over whether a federal judge can sanction a party for conduct in a state court.
January 31, 2024
California Judge Denies Genetic Testing Motion With Trial Approaching

LOS ANGELES — A defendant seeking a medical examination and genetic testing from a plaintiff suffering from mesothelioma does not explain how such testing can be performed or how expert reports can be produced in the short period remaining prior to trial, a California judge said in denying the defendant’s motion among other rulings.
January 31, 2024
Fabricated ChatGPT Cite Leads To 2nd Circuit Grievance Board Referral

NEW YORK — The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 30 referred an attorney to its grievance board for “conduct that falls below the basic obligations of counsel” after she submitted a citation fabricated by artificial intelligence ChatGPT, saying federal rules require that at the very least, attorneys verify the case law they submit in support of their argument.
January 31, 2024
Judge: Offer Of Samples For Testing Largely Moots Protective Order Motion

SEATTLE — Plaintiffs’ ongoing offer to produce talc samples tested by asbestos expert William Longo moots the need for a protective order unless additional samples are found, a judge in Washington state said in denying a motion for protective order and spoliation finding in part.
January 30, 2024
CARD Doctor Says Asbestos Subpoena Likely Seeks ‘Highly Improper’ Testimony

GREAT FALLS, Mont. — The former medical director of a Libby, Mont., clinic told a federal judge in a motion to quash a subpoena that because he never saw a woman when she went to the clinic and her diagnosis at the time differs from the mesothelioma from which she now suffers, any testimony he could offer at trial would be duplicative of evidence a railway already has.
January 30, 2024
Judge Overrules Discovery Objections In FCA Suit, Says Scope Should Be Nationwide

SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge affirmed a magistrate judge’s discovery order and overruled Abbott Laboratories’ objections to the geographical scope of discovery in a suit alleging violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) and state false claims laws regarding an alleged kickback scheme to induce hospitals and physicians to use an Abbott cardiac medical device, finding that the complaint sufficiently alleges a “nationwide scheme.”
January 26, 2024
Insurer Failed To Show Homebuilder’s Discovery Requests Are Not Relevant

AUSTIN, Texas — A Texas federal magistrate judge denied a general liability insurer’s motion for a protective order and to quash subpoenas served on three insurance brokers after determining that the insurer does not have standing to challenge the subpoenas served on the insurance brokers and failed to meet its burden of showing that the information sought by the insured homebuilder is not relevant to the construction defects coverage dispute.
January 26, 2024
Flint Plaintiffs Seek Order Compelling Production Of Documents Improperly Withheld

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — Plaintiffs in the Flint water crisis litigation have moved in Michigan federal court to compel engineering firms that were involved in the decision to switch the city’s water supply to the Flint River, which resulted in the drinking water being contaminated with lead, to comply with court orders to produce documents that the presiding judge has determined were withheld under improper assertions of privilege.
January 26, 2024
Magistrate: Parties In FCA Suit Must Respond To Intervention By Specific Date

INDIANAPOLIS — An Indiana federal magistrate judge ordered parties to respond by Feb. 5 to the state’s motion to intervene in a suit filed by a health care network’s former employee, who alleges that his termination was in retaliation for his expressing concerns over the network’s purported False Claims Act (FCA) violations by illegally inducing physicians to refer patients to the network’s hospitals.