Mealey's Construction Defects
-
January 19, 2024
5th Circuit Affirms Remand Of Class Action Mold Dispute As A Local Controversy
NEW ORLEANS — Under the Class Action Fairness Act’s (CAFA) local controversy exception, a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed a trial court’s order remanding a putative class dispute in which a homebuilder is alleged to have defectively constructed a large number of homes in Louisiana.
-
January 17, 2024
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms $4 Million Reduction Of Faulty Construction Damages
WILMINGTON, Del. — A trial court did not err in reducing an award in favor of a condominium complex’s homeowners association from $12.9 million to $8.3 million for damages caused by a builder’s negligent construction of parts of the condominium units because the association relied on inadmissible testimony to increase the award, the Delaware Supreme Court held in affirming the trial court’s judgment.
-
January 16, 2024
In License And Construction Dispute, Calif. Panel Says Builder Is Entitled To Fees
LOS ANGELES — A construction company that was sued for allegedly performing remodeling work without a license is entitled to attorney fees under the terms of the construction contract because it prevailed in an arbitration proceeding covering the allegedly defective work, a California appeals court panel held in affirming a trial court’s award of attorney fees.
-
January 12, 2024
S.C. Panel: Nonsignatories Can Be Compelled To Arbitrate Home Construction Claims
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Two subsequent purchasers of a newly constructed home that allegedly suffers from construction defects can be compelled to arbitrate their claims against the builder of the home even though they did not sign the home’s original warranty because their breach of warranty claim relied upon the agreement, which contained an arbitration clause, a South Carolina panel found in reversing a trial court’s decision to deny the builder’s motion to compel arbitration.
-
January 12, 2024
Homeowning Company Appeals Judgment, Other Orders In Chinese Drywall Dispute
TAMPA, Fla. — A company that says it purchased a home that suffers from defectively manufactured Chinese drywall appealed to the 11th Circuit U.S Court of Appeals an order denying its motion for reconsideration, an order granting summary judgment in favor of the drywall manufacturer on statute of limitations grounds and a final judgment all entered by a Florida federal trial court.
-
January 11, 2024
In Construction Dispute, Calif. Judge Dismisses Motion Containing Decided Issues
LOS ANGELES — A California judge denied a property developer’s motion for summary adjudication of cross-claims brought against it by a builder after both companies were sued by the owners association of a condominium complex for allegedly violating California building standards because the motion contained issues the developer raised in a previous motion.
-
January 03, 2024
Faulty Construction Claims Against Developer Not Time-Barred, Calif. Judge Says
LOS ANGELES — Claims of defective construction brought by the board of a condominium complex against the complex’s developer are not barred by the applicable 10-year statute of limitations because the developer was in possession of the complex when the defective construction allegedly occurred, a California judge found in denying the developer’s motion for summary judgment/adjudication.
-
January 03, 2024
In Condo Repair Dispute, Utah Panel Reverses Judgment On Construction Lien Claim
SALT LAKE CITY — Despite failing to timely file its preliminary notice of a construction lien, a builder that performed certain repairs on a condominium that suffered from a sewer backup before it was terminated from the project is entitled to recover on its claim for foreclosure of the lien because Utah law allows lien holders to recover for work performed five days after an untimely notice is filed, a Utah panel found in partly reversing a trial court’s judgment.
-
December 22, 2023
Following Stipulation, Indiana Federal Judge Orders Dismissal Of Roofing Claims
HAMMOND, Ind. — An Indiana federal judge dismissed claims arising from the allegedly defective construction of exterior walls and roofing in a new housing development after the owner of the development, the general contractor and a subcontractor filed a joint stipulation of dismissal.
-
December 22, 2023
Iowa Panel Says Record Regarding Faulty Construction Supports Jury Verdict
DES MOINES, Iowa — A trial court did not err in denying a man’s motions for a new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) because the record supports the jury’s verdict that the man misrepresented the condition of a home he renovated and sold to a couple who sued the man after discovering multiple construction defects in the home, an Iowa appellate panel found in affirming the trial court’s judgment.
-
December 22, 2023
Settlement Of Construction Claims Was Made In Good Faith, California Judge Finds
LOS ANGELES — A settlement among three defendants and the owners of a home that allegedly suffers from multiple construction defects was made in good faith because the settlement amount was reasonable and reached through mediation, a California judge found in granting the motion to approve the good faith settlement.
-
December 21, 2023
Indiana Panel: Acceptance Rule, Economic Loss Doctrine Don’t Bar Building Claims
INDIANAPOLIS — A trial court erred in dismissing claims arising from the alleged defective construction of a mixed-use building because neither the acceptance rule nor the economic loss doctrine serve to bar the claims in this instance, an Indiana panel found in reversing and remanding the trial court’s judgment.
-
December 20, 2023
In N.C. Federal Court, Parties Stipulate Dismissal Of Construction Defects Case
ASHEVILLE, N.C. — In light of a settlement reached between a custom homebuilder, its general contractor and a homeowning couple, in North Carolina federal court stipulated to the dismissal with prejudice of an action in which the couple alleged that their home was defectively built and launched a website publicizing their allegations against the builder.
-
December 19, 2023
Roofing Defendant Is Not Entitled To Know Settlement Amount, New Jersey Judge Says
FREEHOLD, N.J. — A sole remaining roofing defendant is not entitled to know the terms of a confidential settlement agreement signed between two other roofing defendants and the condominium association that sued all three companies for allegedly performing substandard work on a residential complex because public policy favors nondisclosure of confidential settlement agreements, a New Jersey judge found in denying the remaining defendant’s motion to compel discovery.
-
December 19, 2023
Nevada Federal Judge Finds Claims Against Dissolved Subcontractor Are Time-Barred
RENO, Nev. — Third-party claims and cross-claims for indemnification and contribution brought by two construction companies against a subcontractor that worked on the construction of a large distribution center that later suffered from defects are time-barred by statute because the subcontractor itself was dissolved more than three years before the claims against it were filed, a Nevada federal judge found in granting the subcontractor’s motion for summary judgment.
-
December 19, 2023
Ala. Federal Judge Compels Arbitration Of Construction Dispute Under 2 Contracts
MOBILE, Ala. — An Alabama federal judge compelled arbitration of a dispute brought by a homeowner who says her newly purchased manufactured home suffers from mold growth against the manufacturer and seller of the home under two separate arbitration agreements because the homeowner signed valid agreements with both parties.
-
December 14, 2023
Warranty For PEX Pipe Did Not Contain Arbitration Agreement, California Judge Says
FULLERTON, Calif. — No arbitration agreement existed between a pipe manufacturer and a plumbing company because the only agreement cited by the manufacturer was a warranty for its products, which a California federal court already said does not create a binding arbitration agreement in a previous case, a California judge found in denying the manufacturer’s motion to compel arbitration of the cross-claims brought against it by the company, which was sued for allegedly defective work it performed at a condominium complex.
-
December 14, 2023
Tenn. Panel Refuses To Consider Deficient Arguments In Construction Defects Case
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. — A Tennessee appellate panel refused to consider the merits of three issues raised by a pro se appellant who was found to have failed to perform construction work in a workmanlike manner by a trial court because the man’s appellate brief failed to comply with the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure and the court’s local rules.
-
December 14, 2023
Indiana Panel: Trial Court ‘Harmonized’ Rules In Dismissing Roofing Claims
INDIANAPOLIS — A trial court “harmonized” two Indiana trial court rules by finding that a company that alleged that a roofing system on a building was negligently installed was required to add or substitute the real parties in interest within 30 days after the defendants moved for summary judgment on the grounds that the company did not own the building at issue, an Indiana appellate court panel found in affirming the trial court’s judgment.
-
December 14, 2023
California Judge: Parties Must Arbitrate Dispute Over Water Damage Renovation
FULLERTON, Calif. — A homeowner must arbitrate claims brought against a construction company and its owner for allegedly defective renovation work performed by the company to repair previous water damage at the home because the contract between the parties is enforceable and not unconscionable, a California judge held in granting the company and owner’s motion to compel arbitration.
-
December 14, 2023
Coalition Files 2nd Amended Complaint In Brazilian Plywood Dispute
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — After one its members was voluntarily dismissed from the action, a coalition of American plywood manufacturers filed a second amended complaint, alleging that an accreditor of plywood certifying agencies contributed to the certification of substandard Brazilian structural plywood as meeting U.S. standards.
-
December 11, 2023
In Construction Row, Ohio Panel Says Man Was Prejudiced By Attorney’s Withdrawal
CLEVELAND — An Ohio appeals court panel found that because a man’s attorney withdrew and he did not receive any court notices as a result, a trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for relief from a judgment it entered in favor of a construction company that was awarded money the man allegedly failed to pay it for work completed on his home.
-
December 07, 2023
Pennsylvania Federal Judge: Fact Issues Exists About Allegedly Negligent Roof Repair
PITTSBURGH — It is unclear whether a roofing contractor or the owner of a store where the contractor performed repairs is required to indemnify the other for damages each incurred in connection with a negligence suit brought by a man who slipped and fell in the store because questions of fact exist about whether the owner authorized the work, which it argues was negligently performed, a Pennsylvania federal judge found in denying both parties’ motions for summary judgment.
-
November 28, 2023
2nd Owners Of Home Can Be Compelled To Arbitrate Mold Claims, Texas Panel Says
BEAUMONT, Texas — Subsequent purchasers of a home that allegedly suffers from mold growth and water damage can be compelled to arbitrate construction defects claims brought against the builder of the home through the arbitration provision of the home’s original purchase agreement under the doctrine of direct-benefits estoppel, a Texas panel found in applying recent Texas Supreme Court precedent.
-
November 28, 2023
Stucco Products Claims Not Subject To Any Prescription Exception, La. Panel Says
LAKE CHARLES, La. — A homeowning couple’s claims of redhibition, negligence and products liability stemming from the yellowing of stucco products that were applied to their home are prescribed on the face of their petition, and no exception to the prescriptions applies, a Louisiana panel found in affirming a trial court’s decision to dismiss the claims.