Mealey's Class Actions

  • August 19, 2024

    $75M Broiler Chicken Price-Fixing Settlements Granted Final Approval

    CHICAGO — A combined $75 million in settlements between direct-purchaser plaintiffs (DPPs) and two of more than a dozen broiler sellers accused of fixing the prices for chicken was granted final approval by a federal judge in Illinois.

  • August 19, 2024

    Delaware High Court Affirms Attorney Fees in $1B Dell Securities Settlement

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A unanimous Delaware Supreme Court upheld a vice chancellor’s award of $266.7 million in attorney fees to counsel for the lead plaintiff in a complaint brought by investors alleging that Dell Technologies Inc., certain of its controlling stockholders and directors, and its financial adviser breached their fiduciary duty by engaging in a stock swap that resulted in significant losses to investors, holding that the vice chancellor did not abuse his discretion in setting the award.

  • August 19, 2024

    Preliminary Approval Given To $7.5M Beyond Meat Protein Content Class Case

    CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois granted preliminary approval of a $7.5 million class settlement between Beyond Meat Inc. and consumers who have alleged that the plant-based meat substitute company inflated protein content and overstated the quality of the protein in its products.

  • August 19, 2024

    6th Circuit Denies Rehearing After Finding Vaccine Claims Must Go To Arbitration

    CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc filed by Kalitta Air LLC pilots after a panel affirmed a trial court ruling that their putative class claims over the airline’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate must go through arbitration first as minor disputes pursuant to the Railway Labor Act (RLA) because the dispute requires interpretation of the terms of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA).

  • August 16, 2024

    Class Action Under Utah Data Privacy Law Survives Retailer’s Dismissal Bid

    SALT LAKE CITY — Finding that consumer plaintiffs have standing and have adequately alleged that a retailer violated Utah’s Notice of Intent to Sell Nonpublic Personal Information Act (NISNPIA) by disclosing their private purchase information to third parties, a federal judge in Utah denied the retailer’s motion to dismiss.

  • August 15, 2024

    Plaintiff Prevails In 3rd Dismissal Ruling In ERISA Forfeiture Cases

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — Plaintiffs have now prevailed in two of the three rulings on dismissal motions in recent Employee Retirement Income Security Act cases filed against retirement plan sponsors for allegedly not using forfeited nonvested matching contributions to pay administrative expenses, with the California federal judge that issued the third ruling differentiating the claims from those in a similar case that was dismissed with leave to amend.

  • August 15, 2024

    Magistrate Approves Fees In Data Breach Case Despite Initial, Inflated Calculation

    BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A federal magistrate judge in New York has granted a plaintiffs’ motion for attorney fees and costs following a $626,985.58 settlement in litigation over a data breach, ruling that although the plaintiffs’ initial calculation was “inflated,” the fees sought were “reasonable” based on other factors including the value of the multiplier applied to a recalculated amount of hours and billing rates, often referred as a “lodestar.”

  • August 14, 2024

    Bar Association, Other Amici Say Preliminary Injunction Enough For Attorney Fees

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In the first of 10 amicus briefs supporting arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court by Virginians seeking attorney fees related to their putative class complaint over a now repealed suspension of driver’s licenses statute, the New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) tells the justices that a merits-based preliminary injunction is enough to establish a “prevailing party” under federal fee-shifting statutes.

  • August 14, 2024

    9th Circuit Partly Revives Investor’s Price-Fixing Claim Against Crypto Outfits

    SAN FRANCISCO — A panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals partially revived a putative class complaint brought by an investor against several cryptocurrency companies, alleging that they conspired to deflate the value of a crypto asset, holding that an Arizona federal judge erred in holding that the investor failed to establish personal jurisdiction regarding the crypto companies.

  • August 14, 2024

    2nd Circuit Revives Part Of ERISA Disclosure Suit Involving Converted Plan

    NEW YORK — In an Aug. 13 ruling partly reversing dismissal of a putative class action over annual benefit statements provided after a traditional defined benefit retirement plan was converted to a cash balance plan, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said the Employee Retirement Income Security Act requires the statements to “unambiguously indicate a plan participant’s ‘total benefits accrued.’”

  • August 14, 2024

    Data Breach Class Complaint Against Restaurant Group Sent Back To State Court

    LOS ANGELES — A putative class complaint accusing Panda Restaurant Group Inc. of failing to have sufficient measures in place to protect customers’ personal data belongs in state court, a federal judge in California ruled, opining that even though the data breach affected the operator of more than 2,000 restaurants in 30 states, the plaintiff is free to limited his proposed class to California customers.

  • August 14, 2024

    Former College Baseball Player Hits NCAA With Class Suit Over Scholarship Limits

    DENVER — The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) bylaw limiting the number of baseball and other sports scholarships a school may offer constitutes “wage fixing” and violates the Sherman Act, a former college baseball player alleges in his putative class complaint filed in a federal court in Colorado.

  • August 13, 2024

    Judge Follows U.S. Supreme Court On Tolling Question In ACA Reinsurance Row

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Citing “a duty to follow intervening Supreme Court precedent” under which tolling pursuant to American Pipe & Constr. Co. v. Utah does not apply, a U.S. Court of Federal Claims judge dismissed group health plans’ consolidated cases over allegedly illegal exactions made under the Transitional Reinsurance Program (TRP) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).

  • August 13, 2024

    Planned Parenthood’s $6M Data Breach Class Settlement Granted Conditional Approval

    LOS ANGELES — A California judge conditionally granted final approval of a $6 million settlement to be paid by Planned Parenthood Los Angeles (PPLA) to end a consolidated class complaint accusing the reproductive health care provider of failing to protect patients’ personally identifiable information and protected health information from being accessed and stolen.

  • August 13, 2024

    5th Circuit Upholds Dismissal Of Class Suit Seeking TSA Security Fee Refunds

    NEW ORLEANS — A putative class complaint by customers seeking damages from Southwest Airlines Co. after being given travel credits rather than refunds for security fees paid on reservations that were later canceled is preempted under the Airline Deregulation Act (ADA), a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled in a per curiam opinion, affirming a trial court’s decision.

  • August 13, 2024

    HomeServices’ $250M Real Estate Commissions Settlement Granted Preliminary OK

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A federal judge in Missouri granted preliminary approval of a $250 million settlement to be paid by HomeServices of America Inc., BHH Affiliates LLC, Long & Foster Companies Inc. and HSF Affiliates LLC (together, HomeServices) to end claims in a real estate commission class lawsuit in a federal court in Missouri that HomeServices conspired with the National Association of Realtors and other real estate franchises to artificially inflate the cost of commissions in residential real estate transactions.

  • August 13, 2024

    High Court Told Preliminary Injunction Is Sufficient Relief For Attorney Fees

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A preliminary injunction is “tangible relief” sufficient to determine a prevailing party, Virginians argue in a respondent brief filed in the U.S. Supreme Court opposing a petitioner brief by the commissioner of the Viriginia Department of Motor Vehicles, who is challenging a ruling by a divided Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that the Virginians were the prevailing parties in a putative class complaint over a now repealed statute regarding the suspension of driver’s licenses.

  • August 13, 2024

    Beyond Meat, Consumers Reach $7.5M Settlement In Protein Content Class Case

    CHICAGO — Consumers who filed a consolidated class complaint in a federal court in Illinois accusing Beyond Meat Inc. of labeling its plant-based meat substitutes with inflated protein content and overstating the quality of the protein filed an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of a $7.5 million settlement.

  • August 13, 2024

    3rd Circuit Appeal Filed Over Summary Judgment Against Class In ERISA Row

    PHILADELPHIA — Retirement plan participants have filed a notice of appeal to the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals challenging summary judgment for Evonik Corp. and related entities in their Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action.

  • August 12, 2024

    Putative Class Action Focuses On TIAA Tool That Allegedly Favored Proprietary Annuities

    NEW YORK — Alleging “an ongoing unlawful scheme to enhance corporate profits” based on a tool that they claim favored two proprietary annuities, plaintiffs who participate in university retirement plans filed a putative class action against Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (TIAA) and Morningstar Inc. and related entities.

  • August 12, 2024

    Judge Won’t Dismiss Class Suit Over ‘Liquid Smoke’ Claims Against Gouda Maker

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge on Aug. 9 denied a gouda cheese maker’s motion to dismiss a putative class action brought against it by a customer who claims the company violated California consumer protection laws by deceptively labeling its product as “smoked gouda” when the gouda was not smoked but had liquid smoke flavor added.

  • August 12, 2024

    2nd Circuit Sets Oral Argument In ERISA Appeal Of Jury Ruling Against Class

    NEW YORK — The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has set oral argument for Sept. 25 in an appeal involving whether the “could have” standard used in damages instructions is grounds for overturning judgment in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action that went before a jury, and Yale University and related appellees have filed a notice of supplemental authority regarding a sister circuit’s ruling.

  • August 12, 2024

    Respondents To High Court: ERISA Doesn’t Need A New ‘Arms-Length’ Carveout

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Asserting in their Aug. 9 respondent brief that the “case would have come out differently in exactly zero circuits,” retirement plan participants urge the U.S. Supreme Court to deny review of a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals decision regarding the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s prohibited transaction provision.

  • August 12, 2024

    Facebook To High Court: Risk Disclosure Statements Weren’t Misleading

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The social media giant formerly known as Facebook Inc. told the U.S. Supreme Court in an Aug. 9 brief that the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals erred when it held that the company issued misleading statements about the risk of potential misuse of user data because the company was aware that it had already occurred; Facebook argues that it disclosed all information required under federal securities laws.

  • August 12, 2024

    Reconsideration Of Attorney Fees Denied In Jack In The Box Workers’ Wage Suit

    PORTLAND, Ore. — A federal judge in Oregon denied a motion by Jack in the Box Inc. workers to reconsider an April opinion, which partially granted and partially denied motions for attorney fees and costs by both sides in a wage-and-hour suit brought by a class of workers who saw some success with their claims, and apply a prime rate enhancement, opining that there was no showing of clear error or that the “decision was manifestly unjust.”

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Class Actions archive.