Mealey's California Section 17200
-
April 15, 2024
Pipeline Operators, Property Owners Agree To Settle Oil Spill Claims For $70M
LOS ANGELES — In California federal court, two companies that formerly operated an oil pipeline that ruptured and contaminated residential property in southern California filed a motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement that would see the companies pay $70 million to property owners who were affected by the rupture.
-
April 12, 2024
23andMe Data Breach Suits Centralized In Northern California MDL
SAN FRANCISCO — The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPMDL) on April 11 granted a request by genetic testing company 23andMe to consolidate 39 pending lawsuits against it in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, all of which relate to a data breach in which ancestral records for roughly 6.9 million customers were hacked and allegedly sold online.
-
April 12, 2024
Judge Says NJOY Can’t Email UCL Suit To Chinese Vape Makers
SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge denied as “premature” a motion by e-cigarette maker NJOY LLC, an Altria Group Inc. subsidiary, to permit alternative service to several Chinese e-cigarette manufacturers it accuses of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and federal cigarette regulations by illegally selling “Elf Bar” and other brands of flavored disposable vapes (FDVs).
-
April 11, 2024
Insurer Accused Of Using AI Software To Deny Claims ‘En Masse’ In Class Suit
OAKLAND, Calif. — An insured filed a putative class action in California state court accusing his insurer of violating California’s insurance regulations and its unfair competition law (UCL) by using artificial intelligence (AI) software to deny claims for coverage.
-
April 10, 2024
Viability Of UCL Class Action Involving Asbestos And Talc Rests With 9th Circuit
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard oral arguments over whether allegations of a decades-long advertising campaign about the safety and purity of talcum powder sufficiently specifies the advertising in question and saves a California unfair competition law (UCL) class action alleging that in reality the products contained asbestos and other contaminants.
-
April 10, 2024
Pharma Companies Seek High Court Review Of Ruling Reversing FCA Suit Dismissal
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Pharmaceutical companies accused of violating the False Claims Act (FCA) by artificially inflating drug prices filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking review of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ reversal of a district court’s dismissal of a qui tam suit against them, arguing, in part, that the panel “created a circuit split by holding that a relator can avoid the public disclosure bar by ‘stitching together’ public disclosures.”
-
April 10, 2024
Products’ Nutrition Claims With ‘Childlike Drawings’ Are Puffery, Judge Says
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted in part and denied in part a fruit company’s motion to dismiss a putative class action against it for labeling various fruit products as “Healthy” and providing “Good Nutrition” despite containing significant amounts of sugar, writing that the statements are next to “childlike drawings” and therefore unlikely to deceive a consumer.
-
April 09, 2024
Judge: Deception Claims Over ‘100% Recyclable’ Plastic Bottles May Proceed
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on April 8 denied a motion to dismiss a putative class action brought by three consumers and The Sierra Club accusing The Coca-Cola Co. and two other bottling companies of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by labeling plastic bottles as “100% recyclable,” finding that the plaintiffs sufficiently alleged based on a survey that most consumers would be deceived.
-
April 08, 2024
Driver Appeals Grant Of Summary Judgment On UCL Claim For ‘Unfair’ COVID Premiums
SAN FRANCISCO — A driver on April 5 appealed to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a California federal judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of GEICO after finding that it did not violate California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by unfairly profiting from a premium giveback program initiated during the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
April 04, 2024
Panel Affirms Dismissal Of Suit Demanding $160,000 From Medi-Cal Insurer For Supplies
LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel on April 3 affirmed the dismissal of a medical supplies provider’s lawsuit against an insurer that operates under the state’s Medicaid program, finding that the provider failed to plead the existence of a contract that was breached, fraud or a violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) based on the provider’s alleged nonpayment of more than $160,000 for medical supplies.
-
April 03, 2024
Google, Privacy Plaintiffs Propose Injunctive Relief To Settle Data-Tracking Suit
SAN JOSE, Calif. — Leapfrogging over the typical procedure of seeking preliminary approval of a proposed class action settlement over Google LLC’s purported tracking of users’ internet browsing activity and data, the named plaintiffs filed a motion in California federal court seeking final approval of a “groundbreaking” agreement under which the technology giant pledges to make changes to its data collection and retention practices, among other things.
-
April 03, 2024
Chili’s Customers: Class Damages Methodology Review Not Needed In Data Breach Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court does not need to review a question presented by a restaurant chain owner in a data breach case concerning the damages methodology used by the certified classes’ expert as the underlying decision doesn’t present the question Brinker International Inc. seeks to resolve, restaurant customers argue in their respondent brief.
-
April 02, 2024
Judge Grants Summary Judgment In Favor Of Baby Food Maker In Heavy Metals Suit
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted a baby food maker’s motion for summary judgment on class action claims against it for allegedly concealing the presence of heavy metals in its “organic” baby food products in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and consumer protection laws of several other states.
-
April 02, 2024
HP’s $18M Age Bias Class, Collective Settlement Granted Final Approval
SAN JOSE, Calif. — A federal judge in California granted final approval of an $18 million settlement to be paid by HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co. (together, HP) to end a collective and class complaint accusing the technology company of terminating older workers during workforce reductions and replacing them with younger employees in violation of federal and California law, including California’s unfair competition law (UCL).
-
April 01, 2024
Judge Won’t Reconsider Order Allowing Heavy Metal Claims Against Chocolate Company
SAN DIEGO — The chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California on March 29 denied a chocolate company’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying in part its motion to dismiss a putative class action against it for allegedly concealing the presence of heavy metals in its chocolates, rejecting the company’s argument that the court’s ruling permitting labeling claims was based on a “misunderstanding.”
-
March 29, 2024
Flyer’s Suit Against Delta For Deceptive ‘Greenwashing’ Not Preempted, Judge Rules
LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge on March 28 granted in part and denied in part Delta Air Lines Inc.’s motion to dismiss a flyer’s putative class action accusing the airline of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by misleading consumers with “greenwashing” statements such as describing itself as “carbon-neutral” based on its environmental, social and governance (ESG) investments.
-
March 28, 2024
Judge Nixes Some Lead Claims Related To Trader Joe’s Dark Chocolate Products
SAN DIEGO — A federal judge in California on March 27 dismissed without prejudice California state law claims, including an unfair competition law (UCL) claim, against Trader Joe’s Co. related to allegations that its dark chocolate products contain lead and other heavy metals but denied dismissal with regard to claims brought pursuant to business practice laws in other states.
-
March 27, 2024
Judge Allows UCL, Negligence Claims Against Roblox In Mothers’ ‘Gambling’ Suit
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on March 26 granted in part and denied in part a motion by Roblox Corp. to dismiss a putative class action brought against it by two mothers who accuse it of being liable for their minor children’s engagement in illegal gambling games on the Roblox platform.
-
March 27, 2024
Judge Remands UCL Suit Against Gift Card Issuer Over Drained Cards
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on March 26 remanded a complaint filed by the San Francisco city attorney on behalf of California against a gift card issuer and three banking entities that the city attorney accuses of violating the state’s unfair competition law (UCL) by issuing insufficiently secured pre-loaded debit cards that were allegedly drained before being used by customers who paid for the cards.
-
March 27, 2024
Judge Dismisses Construction Defects Insurance Suit After Parties Agree To Settle
OAKLAND, Calif. — After the parties notified the court that they had reached a global settlement, a federal judge in California on March 26 dismissed with prejudice the case between two excess insurers and a construction firm and related entities that sought a defense for a series of construction defect claims.
-
March 26, 2024
Judge Grants Preliminary Approval To Settlement For Lender’s ‘Junk Fees’
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California federal judge granted a motion for preliminary approval of a settlement under which Ocwen Financial Corp. and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC (together, Ocwen) will pay an estimated $53 million to resolve a mortgagor’s class action claims against it for charging “hidden junk fees” in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and California’s unfair competition law (UCL).
-
March 26, 2024
Panel Says Sex Toy Maker’s ‘Inconspicuous’ Arbitration Agreement Not Binding
LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel on March 25 affirmed a trial court’s denial of a sex toy maker’s motion to compel arbitration of a putative class action filed against it by a consumer who claimed that the company deceptively marketed one of its products in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), finding that the company’s “browsewrap” arbitration agreement could be viewed only by clicking a “tiny, inconspicuous link.”
-
March 26, 2024
UCL, Declaratory Judgment Counterclaims Tossed In Dispute Over Marks, Logo
HARTFORD, Conn. — Trademark infringement and false advertising plaintiffs secured dismissal on March 25 of allegations that they violated the California unfair competition law (UCL), with a federal judge in Connecticut ruling that complained-of securities transactions took place overseas.
-
March 25, 2024
Judge Grants Summary Judgment On Driver’s UCL Claim For ‘Unfair’ COVID Premiums
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted GEICO’s motion for summary judgment on an insured’s claim against it for violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by unfairly profiting from a premium giveback program initiated during the COVID-19 pandemic, in part citing evidence that state insurance regulators deemed GEICO’s givebacks sufficient.
-
March 22, 2024
Meta, Spotify Back Epic’s Motion To Enforce Injunction In App Store Antitrust Row
OAKLAND, Calif. — Agreeing with plaintiff Epic Games Inc. that Apple Inc. has not complied with an injunction requiring it to permit app developers to inform users of methods of making in-app purchases (IAPs) outside of the App Store, Meta Platforms Inc., Spotify USA Inc. and others moved to file amicus curiae briefs in California federal court supporting Epic’s motion to enforce the injunction.