Mealey's California Insurance

  • July 25, 2023

    Insurers To Attend Settlement Conference In Coverage Dispute Over Tenants’ Claims

    OAKLAND, Calif. — A plaintiff insurer and a defendant commercial general liability insurer will participate in a settlement conference in a declaratory judgment lawsuit arising from an underlying action alleging that their mutual insured attempted to drive tenants out of their units.

  • July 24, 2023

    No Coverage Owed For Gas Station’s Losses Arising From Coronavirus, Panel Affirms

    PASADENA, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s dismissal of a gas station owner insured’s lawsuit seeking coverage for its economic losses arising from the coronavirus pandemic, concluding that the virus exclusion bars coverage because COVID-19 “is the efficient proximate cause” of the insured’s purported losses.

  • July 21, 2023

    No EPL, D&O Coverage Owed For Arbitration Award, 9th Circuit Affirms

    PASADENA, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of an insurer in a coverage dispute over an underlying arbitration award, finding that two policy exclusions bar employment practices and directors and officers liability coverage for the arbitration award.

  • July 18, 2023

    California Panel Affirms Dismissal Of Homeowners Insurer, Bank From Construction Row

    LOS ANGELES — A California appeals panel has affirmed the dismissal of a homeowners insurer and a mortgage lender from a construction company’s suit seeking to $128,187.34 for work it performed on the homeowners’ house that an arbitrator found was offset by the homeowners’ damages for construction defects, among other things, finding that the company’s claims against the insurer and bank are derivative of its claims against the homeowners and, therefore, barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion.

  • July 18, 2023

    Fitness Company Seeks To Dismiss Gym Fee Dispute Stemming From COVID Lockdowns

    LOS ANGELES — A fitness and health company and its wholly owned subsidiary moved to dismiss a putative class complaint brought by a gym member alleging breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, negligent representation and violations of California law in continuing to charge fees for gym memberships during COVID-19 lockdowns when the gyms could not be accessed, contending that the statute of limitations had run on most of the claims and that the claim of negligent misrepresentation was inadequately pleaded.

  • July 17, 2023

    Panel Reverses, Says Insurers Have Duty To Defend Seller Of Contaminated Land

    LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel ruled that a trial court erred by granting summary adjudication in favor of two insurers on the duty to defend a lawsuit against an insured for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws due to ongoing groundwater contamination at an industrial property it sold in 1995.

  • July 17, 2023

    Homeowners Association Appeals Ruling For Insurer In Suit Arising From Roof Damage

    LOS ANGELES — A condominium homeowners association has appealed a California judge’s grant of summary judgment to its insurer in its breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit arising from storm damage to the roof of a Studio City building that housed 31 luxury condominiums.

  • July 14, 2023

    Breach Of Contract, Bad Faith Claims To Proceed In Wildfire Coverage Suit

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California federal judge denied a property insurer’s motion to dismiss insureds’ claims for breach of contract and bad faith after determining that the insureds stated sufficient facts to support both claims.

  • July 13, 2023

    Insureds Were Not Withheld Policy Benefits; Bad Faith Claim Fails, Judge Says

    LOS ANGELES — A second amended complaint filed by insureds against their homeowners insurers must be dismissed because the insureds’ bad faith claim, the only claim alleged against the insurers, cannot proceed as the insureds were not withheld benefits and the insurers did not cancel the policy despite an initial notice of cancellation.

  • July 12, 2023

    Split Panel Affirms Dismissal Of Insured’s Suit For Unfair Claims Handling

    SAN FRANCISCO — A split California appellate panel on July 11 affirmed the dismissal as time-barred of an insured’s putative class action accusing its insurer of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by improperly denying her property insurance claim for replacement of a decayed staircase without investigation, although a dissenting judge said the insured’s UCL claim was not time-barred.

  • July 12, 2023

    Insurers Seek Dismissal Of Suit For Payment Of Gym Fees During COVID-19 Lockdowns

    LOS ANGELES — Two California health insurers moved to dismiss a putative class complaint brought by a gym member alleging breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, negligent representation and violations of California law in continuing to charge fees for gym memberships during COVID-19 lockdowns when the gyms could not be accessed, contending that there was no contractual relationship between the insurers and the gym members regarding their memberships.

  • July 12, 2023

    Panel: Insured Faces ‘Solid Wall Of Precedent’ In Coronavirus Coverage Appeal

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California appellate court affirmed a ruling in favor of a commercial property insurer in an Orange County restaurant owner insured’s breach of contract lawsuit arising from the coronavirus pandemic, finding that the insured “faces a solid ‘wall of precedent’ that holds that direct physical loss or damage requires physical alteration of the covered property.”

  • July 11, 2023

    ‘No Way To Know’ If Damage To Embryos Occurred Is Fatal To Insureds’ Coverage Claim

    SAN FRANCISCO —A California appeals court panel held that the “mere possibility” that insureds’ embryos suffered physical damage is insufficient to create a triable issue of fact to trigger homeowners insurance coverage, affirming a summary judgment ruling in favor of the insurer in a coverage dispute arising from embryos that were deemed “no longer viable” after a cryogenic tank’s temperature failure.

  • July 06, 2023

    Federal Judge Denies Interpleader In Coverage Dispute Over D&O Policy

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California federal judge denied an insurer’s motion to amend a complaint to add an interpleader in its suit seeking a declaration that a directors and officers (D&O) insurance policy is rescinded because of the insureds’ material misrepresentations or a declaration that it has no duty to indemnify or defend in an underlying action, finding that allowing an interpleader “would be both futile and prejudicial.”

  • June 29, 2023

    California Federal Judge Says Stay Of Water Damage Coverage Suit Not Warranted

    RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A California federal judge denied a motion to stay filed by insureds in a water damage coverage suit alleging claims for breach of contract and bad faith after determining that the insureds failed to show that their insurer’s notice of removal to federal court was fraudulent.

  • June 29, 2023

    Panel Rejects Insurer’s Appeal In Subrogation Suit Arising From CIPA Settlement

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California appeals panel on June 28 affirmed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in an insurer’s subrogation lawsuit seeking to recover defense and settlement costs that it paid in an underlying class action alleging its insured violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), concluding that the defendants had no indemnification obligation because the insured failed to give them control over the defense and settlement of the class action.

  • June 27, 2023

    Insureds Appeal California Court’s Ruling In Insurer’s Favor In COVID-19 Dispute

    LOS ANGELES — Insureds filed a notice appealing a Los Angeles County Superior Court’s judgment on a jury’s special verdict in favor of a commercial property insurer in a breach of contract coverage lawsuit arising from the coronavirus pandemic, challenging the jury’s finding that SARS-CoV-2 did not cause any direct physical loss or damage to the insureds’ hotel on or before June 1, 2020.

  • June 23, 2023

    Panel:  Restaurants Allege Communicable Disease Event, Direct Physical Loss, Damage

    LOS ANGELES — A California appeals panel held June 22 that restaurant insureds sufficiently asserted the existence of a covered communicable disease event and direct physical loss or damage under their property insurance policy, reversing a lower court’s judgment against the insureds in their breach of contract and bad faith coverage lawsuit arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • June 21, 2023

    Federal Judge Dismisses FCA Suit Against PBM, Cites Public-Disclosure Bar

    SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge dismissed a relator’s suit asserting that a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by enrolling beneficiaries of a federal government insurer in automatic delivery, resulting in beneficiaries receiving more drugs than medically necessary, finding that dismissal is warranted under the public-disclosure bar because a newspaper article and a U.S. Department of Defense rule “disclosed the allegedly fraudulent transactions at issue.”

  • June 20, 2023

    Judge Rules On Dismissal Motions In FCA Suit Alleging Fraudulent ACA Upcoding

    SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California denied an insurer’s motion to dismiss the federal government’s operative first amended complaint in intervention alleging federal False Claims Act (FCA) violations related to claims under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) by upcoding, causing the government to overpay, finding that the government “sufficiently pled a factual falsity theory.”

  • June 20, 2023

    California Judge Rules In Insurer’s Favor In Suit Arising From Roof Damage

    LOS ANGELES — A California judge granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a condominium homeowners association insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit arising from alleged storm damage to the roof of a Studio City building that housed 31 luxury condominiums, finding that the insurer has met its burden of establishing that the policy’s water damage and faulty workmanship exclusions applied to bar coverage.

  • June 19, 2023

    Insurer Owes No Coverage For 2 Suits Against Contractor, 9th Circuit Affirms

    SEATTLE — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 16 affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of a commercial general liability insurer in a contractor insured’s lawsuit alleging breach of contract and bad faith, finding that coverage was not triggered because the two underlying lawsuits brought against the insured seek liability arising from contractual obligations and debts and not from property damage.

  • June 16, 2023

    Settlement Of Up To $117.7M To Proceed In Life Insurance Cost Increase Suits

    PHILADELPHIA — A Pennsylvania federal judge has granted preliminary approval of a class settlement including a fund of up to $117.75 million and a five-year cost of insurance (COI) rate increase freeze that would resolve two similar cases regarding universal life insurance policies.

  • June 15, 2023

    Panel: Insured’s Late Notice Of Theft/Vandalism Claim Actually Prejudiced Insurer

    PASADENA, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held June 14 that an insured’s late notice of its claim seeking coverage for its losses stemming from theft and vandalism following a tenant vacancy actually prejudiced its insurer as a matter of law, affirming a lower court’s grant of the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment in the insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit.

  • June 14, 2023

    Vizio Tells 9th Circuit Its 4th Amended Complaint Is ‘More Than Sufficient’

    SAN FRANCISCO — Responding to an insurer’s contention that its appeal “merely regurgitates the same failed arguments,” Vizio Inc. tells the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that the allegations in its fourth amended complaint are “more than sufficient” to permit it to proceed past the pleading stage in its lawsuit seeking coverage for an underlying $17 million settlement and defense costs arising from class claims alleging unauthorized collections of consumers’ television viewing data.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's California Insurance archive.