Mealey's California Insurance
-
June 29, 2023
California Federal Judge Says Stay Of Water Damage Coverage Suit Not Warranted
RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A California federal judge denied a motion to stay filed by insureds in a water damage coverage suit alleging claims for breach of contract and bad faith after determining that the insureds failed to show that their insurer’s notice of removal to federal court was fraudulent.
-
June 29, 2023
Panel Rejects Insurer’s Appeal In Subrogation Suit Arising From CIPA Settlement
SAN FRANCISCO — A California appeals panel on June 28 affirmed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in an insurer’s subrogation lawsuit seeking to recover defense and settlement costs that it paid in an underlying class action alleging its insured violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), concluding that the defendants had no indemnification obligation because the insured failed to give them control over the defense and settlement of the class action.
-
June 27, 2023
Insureds Appeal California Court’s Ruling In Insurer’s Favor In COVID-19 Dispute
LOS ANGELES — Insureds filed a notice appealing a Los Angeles County Superior Court’s judgment on a jury’s special verdict in favor of a commercial property insurer in a breach of contract coverage lawsuit arising from the coronavirus pandemic, challenging the jury’s finding that SARS-CoV-2 did not cause any direct physical loss or damage to the insureds’ hotel on or before June 1, 2020.
-
June 23, 2023
Panel: Restaurants Allege Communicable Disease Event, Direct Physical Loss, Damage
LOS ANGELES — A California appeals panel held June 22 that restaurant insureds sufficiently asserted the existence of a covered communicable disease event and direct physical loss or damage under their property insurance policy, reversing a lower court’s judgment against the insureds in their breach of contract and bad faith coverage lawsuit arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
June 21, 2023
Federal Judge Dismisses FCA Suit Against PBM, Cites Public-Disclosure Bar
SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge dismissed a relator’s suit asserting that a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by enrolling beneficiaries of a federal government insurer in automatic delivery, resulting in beneficiaries receiving more drugs than medically necessary, finding that dismissal is warranted under the public-disclosure bar because a newspaper article and a U.S. Department of Defense rule “disclosed the allegedly fraudulent transactions at issue.”
-
June 20, 2023
Judge Rules On Dismissal Motions In FCA Suit Alleging Fraudulent ACA Upcoding
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California denied an insurer’s motion to dismiss the federal government’s operative first amended complaint in intervention alleging federal False Claims Act (FCA) violations related to claims under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) by upcoding, causing the government to overpay, finding that the government “sufficiently pled a factual falsity theory.”
-
June 20, 2023
California Judge Rules In Insurer’s Favor In Suit Arising From Roof Damage
LOS ANGELES — A California judge granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a condominium homeowners association insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit arising from alleged storm damage to the roof of a Studio City building that housed 31 luxury condominiums, finding that the insurer has met its burden of establishing that the policy’s water damage and faulty workmanship exclusions applied to bar coverage.
-
June 19, 2023
Insurer Owes No Coverage For 2 Suits Against Contractor, 9th Circuit Affirms
SEATTLE — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 16 affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of a commercial general liability insurer in a contractor insured’s lawsuit alleging breach of contract and bad faith, finding that coverage was not triggered because the two underlying lawsuits brought against the insured seek liability arising from contractual obligations and debts and not from property damage.
-
June 16, 2023
Settlement Of Up To $117.7M To Proceed In Life Insurance Cost Increase Suits
PHILADELPHIA — A Pennsylvania federal judge has granted preliminary approval of a class settlement including a fund of up to $117.75 million and a five-year cost of insurance (COI) rate increase freeze that would resolve two similar cases regarding universal life insurance policies.
-
June 15, 2023
Panel: Insured’s Late Notice Of Theft/Vandalism Claim Actually Prejudiced Insurer
PASADENA, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held June 14 that an insured’s late notice of its claim seeking coverage for its losses stemming from theft and vandalism following a tenant vacancy actually prejudiced its insurer as a matter of law, affirming a lower court’s grant of the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment in the insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit.
-
June 14, 2023
Vizio Tells 9th Circuit Its 4th Amended Complaint Is ‘More Than Sufficient’
SAN FRANCISCO — Responding to an insurer’s contention that its appeal “merely regurgitates the same failed arguments,” Vizio Inc. tells the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that the allegations in its fourth amended complaint are “more than sufficient” to permit it to proceed past the pleading stage in its lawsuit seeking coverage for an underlying $17 million settlement and defense costs arising from class claims alleging unauthorized collections of consumers’ television viewing data.
-
June 09, 2023
9th Circuit Partly Reverses Dismissal Of Disability Claims Against Insurers
SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel reversed in part and affirmed in part a California federal judge’s grant of summary judgment against an insured who accused two insurers of breach of contract and violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) for refusing to find her totally disabled since 1989 when she developed carpal tunnel syndrome and left her primary career, based on a claim she filed in 2020 after leaving a secondary job due to COVID-19-related health concerns.
-
June 09, 2023
Federal Judge: CGL Insurer Owes Defense For Tenants’ Suit Against Mutual Insured
OAKLAND, Calif. — A federal judge in California granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment in its declaratory judgment lawsuit seeking defense from a commercial general liability insurer for an underlying lawsuit brought against their mutual insured, finding that there is no genuine dispute that the underlying lawsuit might fall within coverage under the CGL policy.
-
June 09, 2023
Panel Affirms Ruling In Insurers’ Favor In Aiding And Abetting Malpractice Suit
LOS ANGELES — A California appeals panel affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of insurers in a lawsuit alleging that they conspired with attorneys to force insureds to accept a $750,000 settlement of an underlying lawsuit arising from a failed partnership, finding that the insureds failed to plead any facts to support their contention that the insurers “had actual knowledge of the tortious conduct by the attorney defendants.”
-
June 08, 2023
Calif. Federal Judge Grants Motion To Compel Arbitration, Stays Bad Faith Claim
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted an auto insurer’s motion to compel arbitration of its insured’s breach of contract claim because arbitration is required under California law and further stayed litigation of the insured’s bad faith claim because the result of the arbitration will impact the result of the bad faith claim.
-
June 06, 2023
California Judge Enters Judgment On Special Jury Verdict In Insurer’s Favor
LOS ANGELES — A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge entered judgment on a jury’s special verdict in favor of a commercial property insurer in the insureds’ breach of contract coverage lawsuit arising from the coronavirus pandemic after the jury found last month that SARS-CoV-2 did not cause any direct physical loss or damage to the insureds’ hotel on or before June 1, 2020.
-
June 06, 2023
Dismissal Granted In Row Over Medicare Payments Suspended Due To Alleged Fraud
SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge dismissed without prejudice a suit filed against employees of a Medicare contractor accused of violations of the California Insurance Frauds Prevention Act and California unfair competition law after the employees suspended Medicare payments to a pain management clinic for allegations of fraud, finding that dismissal is proper because the clinic failed to exhaust its administrative remedies pursuant to the Medicare Act.
-
June 06, 2023
Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claim Against Disability Insurer Not Foreclosed
PASADENA, Calif. — A district court erred in entering judgment in favor of a disability insurer on a breach of fiduciary duty claim because the insurer was acting in a fiduciary function when it miscalculated the claimant’s long-term disability benefits, resulting in a more than $56,000 overpayment to the claimant, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said in reversing the district court’s judgment.
-
May 31, 2023
California Panel: Insured’s Direct Physical Loss Claims Are ‘Mere Legal Conclusions’
SAN DIEGO — A California appeals panel on May 30 affirmed a lower court’s grant of a commercial property insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a coverage dispute arising from the coronavirus pandemic, finding that it is clear that the causes of the insured’s business losses are not attributable to the presence of the coronavirus on its premises but are the purported result of “certain government orders, community infection, and assumption that the virus is ubiquitous.”
-
May 30, 2023
Panel Affirms Conversion To Judgment In ‘The Starry Night’ Insurance Fraud Case
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California appellate court on May 26 affirmed a decision converting criminal restitution orders to civil judgments after homeowners pleaded guilty to insurance fraud in overstating their fire-related losses to include an original Vincent van Gogh “The Starry Night” painting, finding that the trial court correctly determined that it had statutory authority to convert restitution orders to civil money judgments.
-
May 26, 2023
Federal Judge Grants In Part Judgment For Insurer In Medical Coverage Dispute
SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge granted in part summary judgment to an insurer seeking a determination that a medical professions liability policy issued to its insured behavioral health provider provides no coverage in an underlying Oregon state court suit, finding that the provider breached the insurance contract by misrepresenting in a renewal application lack of awareness of a possible lawsuit following a former employee’s criminal conviction.
-
May 25, 2023
Judgment Denied In FCA Suit Against Pharmacy Accused Of Overcharging Medicare
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California federal judge denied summary judgment in a whistleblower’s suit against a pharmacy, alleging that it violated the federal False Claims Act (FCA) and the California False Claims Act (CFCA) by overcharging the state of California and federal government for Medi-Cal and Medicare Part D nursing home patients, finding that fact disputes remain as to the actual reason for firing the whistleblower.
-
May 22, 2023
Insurers Resolve Equitable Indemnity, Subrogation Action Over Sinking High-Rise
SAN FRANCISCO — An excess insurer and two insurers it had sued for equitable indemnity and/or equitable subrogation related to damages they paid to settle lawsuits stemming from the sinking of a residential high-rise stipulated to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims in the suit after notifying the court in March that they had reached a confidential settlement.
-
May 22, 2023
Magistrate: Suit Against HOA Insured Fails To Allege ‘Loss’ To Trigger Coverage
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A federal magistrate judge in California on May 18 granted a professional liability insurer’s motion to dismiss a homeowners’ association insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit, finding that an underlying lawsuit against the HOA did not seek a “loss” to trigger coverage under the policy.
-
May 19, 2023
Excess Insurer’s Policies Provide Only Duty To Indemnify, Not Defend, Judge Says
RIVERSIDE, Calif. — An excess insurer’s policies only require the insurer to indemnify its insured for covered claims and does not require the insurer to defend against claims, a California federal judge said in partly granting the excess insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a groundwater contamination coverage suit.