Judge Denies Expert Preclusion Bids, Most Other Motions In ERISA Fees, Funds Case

Attached Documents

• Minute order
• Plaintiffs’ Nov. 24 memorandum of contentions of fact and law
• Defendants’ memorandum of contentions of fact and law
• Plaintiffs’ first motion in limine with attachments
• Defendants’ opposition to plaintiffs’ first motion in limine with attachments
• Plaintiffs’ reply supporting first motion in limine
• Plaintiffs’ second motion in limine
• Defendants’ opposition to plaintiffs’ second motion in limine with attachments
• Plaintiffs’ reply supporting second motion in limine
• Defendants’ first motion in limine
• Defendants’ second motion in limine
• Defendants’ third motion in limine
• Plaintiffs’ omnibus opposition to defendants’ first through third motions in limine
• Defendants’ reply supporting first motion in limine
• Defendants’ reply supporting second motion in limine
• Defendants’ reply supporting third motion in limine
• Defendants’ fourth motion in limine
• Plaintiffs’ opposition to defendants’ fourth motion in limine
• Defendants’ reply supporting fourth motion in limine
• Defendants’ motion to preclude Dirks testimony with attachments
• Plaintiffs’ opposition to precluding Dirks testimony
• Declaration supporting plaintiffs’ opposition to motions to preclude experts with attachments
• Defendants’ reply re Dirks
• Defendants’ motion to preclude Geist testimony with attachments
• Defendants’ notice of errata regarding attachments to motion to preclude Geist testimony with attachments
• Plaintiffs’ opposition to precluding Geist testimony
• Defendants’ reply re Geist with attachment
• Defendants’ motion to preclude Wagner testimony with attachments
• Plaintiffs’ opposition to precluding Wagner testimony
• Defendants’ reply re Wagner with attachment
• Plaintiffs’ amended consolidated complaint