Attached Documents
- Transcript
- NPPC and AFBF’s brief
- PLF’s amicus brief
- California’s response brief
- NAM, NCBA and NFIB’s amicus brief
- PTH’s amicus brief
- TBI’s amicus brief
- State farm groups’ amicus brief
- Food groups’ amicus brief
- Pork groups’ amicus brief
- AASV’s amicus brief
- The 26 states’ amicus brief
- PRMA’s amicus brief
- Knoll and Mason’s amicus brief
- The U.S. Chamber’s amicus brief
- The state associations’ amicus brief
- NAMI’s amicus brief
- WLF’s amicus brief
- AAM’s amicus brief
- The United States’ amicus brief
- NTUF’s amicus brief
- Canards’ amicus brief
- Professor Brilmayer’s amicus brief
- Sexton and Sumners’ amicus brief
- Barringer’s amicus brief
- Animal rights groups’ amicus brief
- The 15 states’ amicus brief
- The humane groups’ amicus brief
- The animal protection organizations and law professors’ amicus brief
- The worker safety advocates’ amicus brief
- The animal-welfare scientists and veterinarians’ amicus brief
- APRL’s amicus brief
- ASPCA’s amicus brief
- Friedman and Deacon’s amicus brief
- Wu’s amicus brief
- The urban groups’ amicus brief
- Sen. Booker’s amicus brief
- Keen and Pool’s amicus brief
- Snead, Eberstadt and Scully’s amicus brief
- Economic research organizations’ amicus brief
- Public health groups’ amicus brief
- Public Citizen’s amicus brief
- Federalism scholars’ amicus brief
- Perdue’s amicus brief
- G.A.P. and EarthClaims’ amicus brief
- PCRM’s amicus brief
- NODPA’s amicus brief
- Small farm advocates’ amicus brief
- The historians’ amicus brief
- ACEF’s amicus brief
- ButcherBox’s amicus brief
- Constitutional law scholars’ amicus brief
- NPPC and AFBF’s reply brief
- Ninth Circuit’s July 28, 2021, opinion
- Animal rights groups’ motion for divided argument
- United States’ motion for divided argument and enlarged time