Attached Documents
- Smith's reply brief
- Colorado's respondent brief
- Smith’s petitioner brief
- Government’s motion to participate
- Government’s amicus brief
- APF’s brief
- FJF’s brief
- MacLeod’s brief
- C12 parties’ brief
- Liberty Counsel’s brief
- Janus parties’ brief
- The Lonang Institute’s brief
- Publishers’ brief
- Petitioner’s First Amendment scholars’ brief
- CRE’s brief
- LLDF and BDF’s brief
- YAF’s brief
- Anti-abortion groups’ brief
- Family and sexuality scholars’ brief
- Family policy organizations’ brief
- JCRL’s brief
- Senators and representatives’ brief
- Green’s brief
- CCCU parties’ brief
- Multimedia professionals’ brief
- Law and economics scholars’ brief
- MSLF and SLF’s brief
- George’s brief
- CatholicVote’s brief
- Kleins’ brief
- Greenfield’s brief
- 20 states’ brief
- LDS parties’ brief
- Catholic League’s brief
- FRC’s brief
- CFC’s brief
- Beckett’s brief
- USCCB parties’ brief
- TMLC’s brief
- ACBC’s brief
- Public Advocate parties’ brief
- Maynard parties’ brief
- Civil rights organizations’ brief
- NWLC parties’ brief
- NYSBA’s brief
- Public Citizen’s brief
- Humanist and atheist groups’ brief
- Religious stakeholders’ brief
- Local governments and mayors’ brief
- Religious, civil rights and grassroots organizations’ brief
- Social scientists’ brief
- Disability rights groups’ brief
- LCCRUL parties’ brief
- Psychological groups’ brief
- Public accommodations scholars’ brief
- MMAA and MVA’s brief
- Respondents’ six First Amendment scholars’ brief
- Respondents’ eight First Amendment scholars’ brief
- Wolff’s brief
- Behavioral science and economics scholars’ brief
- ABA’s brief
- ACLU’s brief
- LGBTQ groups’ brief
- Elected officials groups’ brief
- NAACP’s brief
- Lay Roman Catholics brief
- Congress members’ brief
- SDA amici’s brief
- Tanenbaum’s brief
- 21 states’ brief
- Legislators’ brief
- IFF’s brief
- CWA’s brief
- CCJ’s brief
- Carpenter amici’s brief
- NLF amici’s brief
- ACLL’s brief
- CLS and FSA’s brief
- Designers’ brief
- Boyle’s brief
- 10th Circuit’s ruling
- District Court’s ruling
- Smith’s complaint