Mealey Publications™

TOP STORIES

Mont. High Court: Pa. Law Applies To Reporter’s Subpoenaed Records On Tainted Water

HELENA, Mont. — The Montana Supreme Court on Oct. 15 ruled that a lower court erred when it found that Montana’s Media Confidentiality Act (MMCA) applied to a reporter’s records that were the subject of a subpoena in litigation brought by a hydraulic fracturing company against a media outlet related to a news story about groundwater contamination from fracking operations that affected a family in Pennsylvania.  The high court reversed and remanded the matter, ruling that the lower court “must apply the Pennsylvania Shield Law and the qualified reporter’s privilege to the subpoena and determine whether all or some of the documents sought are privileged under Pennsylvania law.”

On Remand, ERISA Prohibited Transaction Case Is Sent Back To District Court

NEW YORK — Nearly half a year after the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on the question of what is necessary to state an Employee Retirement Income Security Act prohibited transaction claim involving a service provider, the appeals court on Oct. 15 issued two one-paragraph orders — one recalling the mandate and reinstating the case, then one remanding the case to a New York federal court.

Pennsylvania Federal Judge Gives Final OK To $450K Collective, Class Wage Settlement

PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Oct. 15 granted final approval of a $450,000 settlement that resolves production workers’ claims that a manufacturer and seller of coffee and related products violated federal and state wage laws by failing to pay hourly workers for all hours worked, including failing to compensate for pre- and postshift work and miscalculating the regular rate of pay for overtime.

TRO Enjoins Federal Government Shutdown RIFs Of Thousands Of Workers

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California on Oct. 15 granted several unions’ motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) enjoining the federal government’s reduction-in-force (RIF) of thousands of federal workers during the federal government shutdown, writing that if the unions’ allegation that impacted workers were chosen due to their perceived political affiliations is true, it “is the epitome of hasty, arbitrary and capricious decisionmaking.”

Federal Judge ‘Reluctantly’ Dismisses Youths’ Fossil Fuel Executive Orders Suit

BUTTE, Mont. — A federal judge in Montana “reluctantly” ruled Oct. 15 to dismiss a lawsuit filed by 22 minors and young adults against President Donald J. Trump and multiple government agencies seeking to rescind and declare unconstitutional a series of executive orders that include directives to increase fossil fuel production, opining that the plaintiffs failed to establish standing.

Majority Of 11th Circuit Panel Criticizes Exhaustion Precedent But Applies It

ATLANTA — After applying a 40-year-old circuit precedent in a unanimous Oct. 15 panel ruling affirming dismissal of an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) valuation case but remanding for clarification on “whether prejudice attaches,” two panel members suggested that the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals convene en banc “to consider overruling” that precedent, which they said “imposed a judicially-created and atextual administrative exhaustion requirement for fiduciary-breach and statutory claims under” the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

Federal Circuit: Judge Wrong To Find Prior PTAB Ruling Precluded Issues

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Wisconsin federal judge was wrong to apply issue preclusion based on prior findings from the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) when granting summary judgment in a patent infringement dispute over eyeglass lens patents, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held Oct. 15; the panel said the PTAB findings relied on by the judge came under a different standard of proof than that required for district courts.

1 Of Several Doctors Dropped From COVID-Era Connecticut Malpractice Claim

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. — In a medical malpractice lawsuit alleging that a patient’s head injury was misdiagnosed as gastroenteritis during the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient withdrew her complaint against one of the physicians who attended to her in a Connecticut hospital.

Va. Appeals Court Reverses, Remands Ruling Requiring Camera Data Search Warrant

RICHMOND, Va. — The Virginia Court of Appeals on Oct. 14 reversed and remanded a lower court ruling that required police to obtain a search warrant before accessing surveillance camera data, holding that officers were not required to do so because the brief, noncontinuous capture of the appellee’s vehicle movements on public roads did not implicate a reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment.

Ohio Panel Affirms Judgment For Insurer In Fire Coverage Dispute With Mortgagee

TOLEDO, Ohio — An Ohio appellate court on Oct. 14 affirmed a trial court’s judgment for an insurer in a dispute between the insurer and a mortgagee over the debt owed to it after a fire damaged property for which it held a mortgage, finding that the trial court did not err in dismissing the suit because the mortgagee failed to provide evidence establishing damage and repair costs of the mortgaged property and whether it was a total loss.

Federal Circuit Rejects Rehearing Bid For Dumbbell Abstractness Finding

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 14 denied a company’s request for either panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, leaving in place its August finding that a Utah federal judge was wrong to hold that a patent was directed to an abstract idea by conflating a “rather simple mechanical invention” for stacking dumbbells with the kind of computerized automation that is often unpatentable as abstract.

LATEST NEWS

Mont. High Court: Pa. Law Applies To Reporter’s Subpoenaed Records On Tainted Water
On Remand, ERISA Prohibited Transaction Case Is Sent Back To District Court
Pennsylvania Federal Judge Gives Final OK To $450K Collective, Class Wage Settlement
TRO Enjoins Federal Government Shutdown RIFs Of Thousands Of Workers
ICSID Publishes Award Rejecting Dutch Company’s Claims Against Romania
Motion To Compel Discovery Partly Granted In Software Data Sharing Class Dispute
Federal Judge ‘Reluctantly’ Dismisses Youths’ Fossil Fuel Executive Orders Suit
Brita’s ITC Patent Loss Affirmed By Federal Circuit
City Says Its PFAS Case Does Not Belong In MDL For AFFF, Seeks Remand To Wisconsin
Federal Circuit Rejects Rehearing Bid From Database Patent Holder In IPR Appeal
Dismissal Denied In Class Suit Against Sirius Alleging ‘Deceptive Pricing Scheme’
Majority Of 11th Circuit Panel Criticizes Exhaustion Precedent But Applies It
Wash. Cities, Yacht Club Lodge Consent Decree In Federal Stormwater Runoff Suit
Federal Magistrate Judge Sets Bellwether Selection Deadlines In Defective Port MDL
Asbestos Screening Firm Judgment Case To Remain In Federal Court, Judge Says
OpenAI Says Hawaii Man’s Complaints About AI Not Grounds For Injunction
Federal Circuit: Judge Wrong To Find Prior PTAB Ruling Precluded Issues
Mass Tort Cases For Drugs, Medical Devices
Judge Finalizes $50,000 Sanction For Disclosures To U.S. Labor Department
3rd Circuit Rules Against Plan Participant Who Challenged Pension Denial
AFFF Maker Says It Is Not Liable In Native American Tribe’s Tainted Water Case
Labels Tell High Court ISP Knowingly Provided Service To Infringers
West Virginia Mining Company Agrees To Pay Nearly $75K To Settle Federal CWA Suit
Investors Seek Clarification That Mandamus Grant Doesn’t Vacate Deposition Order
Copyright Protection Extends To AI Images, Man Tells Supreme Court
Texas Insurance Code Violation Claims Against Homeowners Insurer Fail, Judge Says
High Court Will Address Whether Freight Brokers May Be Sued For Negligent Hiring
1 Of Several Doctors Dropped From COVID-Era Connecticut Malpractice Claim
5th Circuit Remands Attorney Fees Issue In City Manager’s Race Discrimination Suit
Online Merchant Gets More Time To Oppose Rehearing Of 9th Circuit Remand Ruling