Jury Finds Apple Owes $5.7B In Damages For Haptic Feedback Infringement
SAN DIEGO — A California federal jury on Sept. 25 held that Apple Inc. owes $5.7 billion in damages for infringing a company’s patents covering haptic feedback technology; the jury found that Apple infringed the asserted claims of the patents but did not do so willfully and that Apple failed to show that the asserted claims were invalid.
TikTok Agrees To Settle Ala. Deceptive Trade Practices Suit For At Least $116.2M
MONTGOMERY, Ala. — An Alabama state court judge on Sept. 25 approved a settlement in which TikTok Inc. and related entities agreed to pay a minimum of $116.2 million, which includes $100 million to the state for restitution and remediation, to resolve allegations that TikTok violated the Alabama Deceptive Trade Practices Act and, among other things, designed its platform with addictive features, knowingly exposed minors to mental harms and intentionally misled consumers about the safety of its platform.
Judgment Entered, Fees Denied For Chicago’s Infringement Of Reporter’s Video
CHICAGO — An Illinois federal judge entered a final judgment in favor of a photojournalist whose copyrighted footage of protests that occurred in summer 2020 was infringed by the city of Chicago and a former top police officer, ordering that the photojournalist be paid nearly $200,000 in damages, prejudgment interest and costs and entering a permanent injunction against the city defendants; however, the judge denied the photojournalist’s motion for attorney fees.
Concerned Parties May Weigh In On Charter City’s $1.6B Claim Against Honduras
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) published a tribunal’s order granting the applications of a think tank, two indigenous community advocacy groups and a sustainable investment researcher to file amicus curiae briefs regarding a pending arbitration claim brought by U.S. companies against the Republic of Honduras for allegedly terminating their rights to develop a charter city in a Honduran special economic zone, for which they seek $1.6 billion in damages.
High Court Lets Expanded Citizenship Verification Checks Resume Pending Appeal
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a split decision, the U.S. Supreme Court on Sept. 25 granted an emergency application filed by the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration (SSA) to stay, pending appeal, a lower court’s vacatur of 2025 modifications to the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program, finding that the government was likely to succeed on its argument that the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) authorized the challenged information sharing, which incorporated SSA records, permitted searches using full or partial Social Security numbers and bulk queries and expanded citizenship verification measures.
Woman Amends Class Complaint Involving ‘Nature’s Ozempic’ After Dismissal Motion
LOS ANGELES — A woman seeking to represent nationwide and California classes of purchasers on Sept. 24 amended her complaint against Veracity Wellness Inc. that alleges that the company deceptively markets its Metabolism Ignite dietary supplement as “Nature’s Ozempic” and as a natural alternative to prescription weight-loss drugs, asserting claims for violation of California’s unfair competition law and other laws.
Panel: Judge Correctly Found Pollution Liability Insurer Has No Duty To Defend
SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Sept. 24 affirmed a district court’s ruling that a pollution liability insurer has no duty to defend its insured against underlying suits stemming from the insured’s environmental remediation work, agreeing with the lower court that the pollution conditions at issue were not unexpected or unintended as required by the policies.
Split D.C. Circuit: Copyright Royalty Board Didn’t Fully Explain Sports Royalties
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A partly split District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel vacated the Copyright Royalty Board’s allocation of royalties related to the retransmission of copyrighted sporting events between 2014 and 2017, finding that even though the board evaluated its valuation methods, it never explained how it combined the results to reach the final allocation percentages.
Judgment Issued In Policy Rescission Suit Over ‘Material Misrepresentations’
BROOKLYN, N.Y. — After a commercial general liability insurer accepted its insured’s offer of judgment, a New York federal judge on Sept. 23 entered a declaratory judgment resolving the insurer’s suit seeking policy rescission and a declaration that it owes no duty to defend or indemnify in any underlying litigation related to the construction of sidewalk sheds due to purported misrepresentations in insurance applications; the judgment ended the insurer’s obligation to defend the insured in specific underlying litigation or any other action, rescinded the policies and declared them void ab initio.
Idaho Supreme Court Warns Of AI Dangers After Briefing Issue
BOISE, Idaho — The Idaho Supreme Court warned that litigants’ reliance on artificial intelligence is “fraught with potential peril” while ultimately declining to impose any sanction on a pro se litigant and affirming a $1,176,000 defamation judgment.
Amici Tell High Court Massachusetts Let Estate ‘Evade’ Preemption To Win $64M
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Several parties, including other tobacco companies, on Sept. 23 filed amicus curiae briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court urging it to grant a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Philip Morris USA Inc. (PM), which seeks review of a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling upholding a more than $64 million judgment against it in favor of a smoker’s estate, which the amici say exemplifies the “recurring issue” of courts allowing plaintiffs to “evade” the preemption provision of the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (FCLAA).